We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 15

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals adopts below-cost standard for “non-explicit” tying arrangements
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • March 30 2015

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit last week issued a significant opinion limiting the circumstances in which a defendant's


Supreme Court holds state regulatory board controlled by active market participants is not immune from antitrust liability
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • February 27 2015

When a controlling number of decisionmakers serving on a state regulatory board are active participants in the market or profession being regulated


Fifth Circuit reverses jury verdict for antitrust plaintiffs, finding lack of sufficient evidence to establish a conspiracy
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • January 23 2015

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently reversed a jury verdict of liability under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act


Court of Appeals upholds decision unwinding consummated merger of two physician groups following FTC suit
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • February 17 2015

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on February 10, 2015 issued an opinion in a closely-watched case in which it upheld a lower


FTC announces new Hart-Scott-Rodino and Clayton Act Section 8 thresholds
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • January 21 2015

The Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC") has revised the jurisdictional and filing fee thresholds of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act


Seventh Circuit dismisses Clayton Act Section 8 derivative case
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • June 20 2012

In a recent decision, the Seventh Circuit sharply limited the ability of shareholders to bring derivative suits for possible violations of section 8 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 19 (2006), which prohibits interlocking directors and officers between competitors


FTC announces new Hart-Scott-Rodino and Clayton Act Section 8 thresholds
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • January 27 2012

The Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) has revised the jurisdictional and filing fee thresholds of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the “HSR Act”) and the Premerger Notification Rules (the “Rules”


Hart-Scott-Rodino enforcement: executive equity awards can trigger HSR filing obligations
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • January 6 2012

The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“HSR Act”) requires parties intending to acquire voting securities, assets or certain non-corporate interests to notify the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (“DOJ”), and to observe certain waiting periods, if the HSR filing thresholds are met


FTC announces new Hart-Scott-Rodino and Clayton Act Section 8 thresholds
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • January 25 2011

The Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC") has revised the jurisdictional and filing fee thresholds of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act") and the Premerger Notification Rules (the "Rules"


FTC announces lower Hart-Scott-Rodino thresholds
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • January 21 2010

The Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC") has revised the jurisdictional and filing fee thresholds of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act") and the Pre-merger Notification Rules (the "Rules"