We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 24

Federal Court Blocks Staples-Office Depot Merger, Finding Sale of Office Supplies to Large Business Customers to Be a Distinct Relevant Market
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • May 20 2016

On May 10, 2016, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the Federal Trade Commission successfully established a


District Court Dismisses Tying and Bundling Claims, Holding that Medical-Surgical Distributor Failed to Show Market Power or Injury to Competition
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • April 12 2016

The federal district court for the District of Kansas recently dismissed claims by a medical products distributor that two of its competitors


Third Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Dismissal of Claim that “Loyalty Discounts” Violate Antitrust Laws
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2016

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a significant opinion in an antitrust case this week, in which it upheld a summary


Executive Order Calls on Agencies to Address Industry Concentration: The Implications for Common Ownership Interests
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • May 3 2016

On April 15, 2016, President Obama issued an Executive Order entitled "Steps to Increase Competition and Better Inform Consumers and Workers to


Second Circuit applies rule of reason to uphold preliminary injunction preventing manufacturer from removing Alzheimer’s drug from market
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • June 3 2015

In State of New York v. Actavis plc, No. 14-4624-cv (2d Cir. May 22, 2015), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed "a


Supreme Court holds state regulatory board controlled by active market participants is not immune from antitrust liability
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • February 27 2015

When a controlling number of decisionmakers serving on a state regulatory board are active participants in the market or profession being regulated


FTC announces new Hart-Scott-Rodino and Clayton Act Section 8 thresholds
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • January 25 2011

The Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC") has revised the jurisdictional and filing fee thresholds of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act") and the Premerger Notification Rules (the "Rules"


FTC announces lower Hart-Scott-Rodino thresholds
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • January 21 2010

The Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC") has revised the jurisdictional and filing fee thresholds of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR Act") and the Pre-merger Notification Rules (the "Rules"


Seventh Circuit dismisses Clayton Act Section 8 derivative case
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • June 20 2012

In a recent decision, the Seventh Circuit sharply limited the ability of shareholders to bring derivative suits for possible violations of section 8 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 19 (2006), which prohibits interlocking directors and officers between competitors


FTC announces new Hart-Scott-Rodino and Clayton Act Section 8 thresholds
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • January 27 2012

The Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) has revised the jurisdictional and filing fee thresholds of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the “HSR Act”) and the Premerger Notification Rules (the “Rules”