We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 357

FTC comment: Minnesota law requiring public disclosure of health care contract data increases risk of anticompetitive behavior
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 14 2015

On June 29, 2015, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) responded to a request for comment from two Minnesota state legislators concerning recently


Four FTC commissioners reject Wright’s call for GUPPI safe harbor
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 16 2015

Four members of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a statement on July 13, 2015, disputing claims by a fellow commissioner that the 2010


Merger control: gun jumping goes global
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union, USA
  • June 28 2010

Broadly defined, "gun jumping" refers to unlawful premerger coordination between the parties to an M&A transaction


Local wholesaler-retailer dispute has federal implications
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 16 2014

On August 14, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi issued an opinion finding that state regulations bolstered one


International news: focus on mining and metals
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • Africa, China, Global, United Kingdom, USA
  • September 16 2014

An investor new to Africa needs to understand not only the relevant local laws but also the applicable regional arrangements. Africa has multiple


How to (legally) keep competitors from poaching your key employees: antitrust law and non-poachingnon-solicitation agreements
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 16 2013

How can a company legally protect its valuable interests in key employees, when a competitor can just swoop in with a more attractive employment


Supreme Court leaves standing decisions on foreign antitrust conduct
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 17 2015

On Monday, June 15, the Supreme Court of the United States refused to hear appeals concerning the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act (FTAIA), 15


Lanham Act attorneys’ fees awarded in the absence of damages
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 31 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that even in the absence of an award of damages on a Lanham Act false advertising claim, a party can recover attorneys’ fees after obtaining an injunction that confers substantial benefit to the public


Third Circuit extends Actavis to reverse settlement agreements involving non-cash consideration
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Addressing for the first time whether reverse settlement agreements involving non-cash consideration merit antitrust scrutiny, the U.S. Court of


Despite potential market manipulation, FERC declines to reject power auction results
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 31 2014

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) recently opted not to take action to set aside the results of a power auction that