We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 195

Defendant prevails on non-existent contract
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • November 26 2012

Sometimes, the law simply gets “curiouser and curiouser”


1 for 3 million reverse split fraud claim survives motion to dismiss
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 28 2012

Nancy Wojtas at Cooley LLP alerted me to an interesting ruling case decided last week by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Gardner v. Major Auto. Cos., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118191 (E.D. N.Y. Aug. 21, 2012


Bill would mandate indemnification of LLC agents
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • February 26 2013

California's current limited liability act permits indemnification of any person (including any manager, member, officer, employee, or agent of the


Bill aims to free subversive organizations from registration law and NASAA shoots for mandatory Form D filings
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • April 1 2013

The California Subversive Organization Registration Law, Corporations Code Section 35000 et seq., has been on the books for decades. The law purports


Motions to adjourn do they end or continue a meeting?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • June 24 2013

I've previously remarked on the different usages attached to the word "adjourn". Often a meeting will end with a motion to adjourn. Sometimes, a


County assessors assume a conversion involves a transfer, but are they correct?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 12 2013

When an entity converts into another business form, does a transfer occur? Many California Assessor's offices seem to think so. Therefore, don't be


SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee pushes for oddly named “universal proxy ballots”
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 13 2013

In late July, the SEC's Investor Advisory Committee issued a recommendation that the SEC "explore relaxing the 'bona fide nominee' rule embodied in


“Wherever you go, there you are”, but will you be in the proper county?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2013

The California General Corporation Law makes numerous references to the "proper county". For example, Corporations Code Section 304 empowers the


Can the DBP incorporate by reference a federal form?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • September 23 2013

Almost a year ago, the Commissioner of Corporations (now the Commissioner of Business Oversight) proposed to amend the custody rule, 10 CCR


Where exactly is it written that shareholders aren’t liable for corporate debts?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • November 8 2013

Recently, UCLA Law School Professor Stephen Bainbridge took notice of Section 6.22(b) of the Model Business Corporation Act and asked what might lead