We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 195

I don’t want to express a preference, but I want my vote to count
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 5 2013

I've always considered majority voting to be a profoundly illogical concept that evidences a fundamental misunderstanding of the mechanics of


Delaware court rules Nevada law governs but applies Delaware law
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • May 23 2014

Although there are many significant differences between the corporate laws of Nevada and Delaware, the Nevada Supreme Court has often looked across


Officers and the Business Judgment Rule
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • July 17 2013

Recently, I came across the following assertion: First, other than the recent aberration of Poggetto v. Switzer , the BJR has never been applied to


Directors may be invested with super powers in Nevada but not California
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • February 5 2013

Sometimes investors would like to endow one or more directors with greater voting powers. This is possible with a Nevada corporation by virtue of NRS


Don’t bank on being able to use “bank” in your corporate name
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 6 2013

"Bank" is a good example of a homonym (same spelling and pronunciation but different meaning), a homograph (same spelling but different meaning) and


Move over Hester Prynne: if your company is delinquent, you may also be wearing a scarlet letter
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 10 2012

In 2006, then Assembly Member Jerome Horton authored AB 1418 to require the Board of Equalization and the Franchise Tax Board to make publicly available lists of the 250 largest tax delinquencies in excess of $100,000


Future filing date or future effective date?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • February 11 2013

In general, the date of filing an instrument under the General Corporation Law is the date on which it is received by the Secretary of State's office


California’s GO-Biz site bedeviled by errors and omissions
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • January 2 2013

According to the website, the California Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) was created "to serve as California's single


I’ve been thinking about conversion, but I haven’t decided to convert
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2013

Conversion can be a sensitive subject for some. In California, corporate conversions are a relatively new phenomenon, having made their first appearance


Conversion is not so easy, and so smooth a thing . . .
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2013

Entity conversions are a relatively new phenomena. The legislature first provided for conversion in 1999 when it enacted AB 197 (Ackerman), which