We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 195

Is an immoral contract unlawful?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • January 25 2013

Last week, I wrote about a proposal by the Nevada Secretary of State to ban the establishment of a corporation for an "illicit purpose". Currently


Facebook, Inc. and CalEASI
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • May 15 2012

In 1996, the California legislature enacted SB 261 (Beverly) which established an exemption, Corporations Code Section 25102(o), for the offer or sale of securities by a corporation purauant to an option plan or agreement provided that specified conditions are met


Federal court finds no diversity when California plaintiff sues dissolved California corporation
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 7 2012

Yesterday’s post covered a recent California Court of Appeal decision holding that a corporation mooted its appeal when it filed a certificate of dissolution with the California Secretary of State stating that it was devoid of any assets, debts or liabilities


Mongols Nation finds no Xanadu in Lancaster
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 6 2012

In July 2009, the Mongols Nation Motorcycle Club, Inc. planned to hold its annual convention in Lancaster, California


California’s new LLC Act call me laocoon, but I foresee a mess!
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • September 24 2012

On Friday, Governor Brown signed SB 323 (Vargas) into law


Delaware Court of Chancery “overrules” federal court
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • June 18 2012

I’ve often heard the claim that one reason to incorporate in Delaware is that the courts won’t surprise you


Elimination of exception’s exception for listed companies is in the offing
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • March 2 2012

While many were thinking of love on Valentine’s Day, Assembly member Bob Wieckowski’s thoughts were turned to dissenters’ rights; for on that day he introduced AB 1680


The bulk sales law an unconscionable time a-dying
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2012

In February 1685, Charles II of England, aka the “Merry Monarch”, took ill and to his bed


Non-resident officers and directors found subject to personal jurisdiction of Nevada courts
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 13 2012

In 1977, the United States Supreme Court dealt a mortal blow to Delaware’s sequestration scheme for establishing personal jurisdiction over non-resident directors


Electronic mail requires consent and Cicero’s guide to electioneering
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • October 29 2012

Even before the advent of the personal computer, people were talking about electronic mail