We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 195

I don’t want to express a preference, but I want my vote to count
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 5 2013

I've always considered majority voting to be a profoundly illogical concept that evidences a fundamental misunderstanding of the mechanics of


Is Delaware’s hegemony over corporate law about to end?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2013

Ancient Greece was a coherent culture but not a coherent state. It was comprised of a many city states that vied with each other for ἡ&gamma


Would Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. have a stronger case as a flexible purpose corporation?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 11 2013

Steve Hazen alerted me to the fact that California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris has filed an amicus brief in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores


Alter ego and the internal affairs doctrine
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • March 21 2013

The internal affairs doctrine is a conflict of laws principle that recognizes that only one state should have the authority to regulate a


The Arcana of dating stockholder consents
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 13 2013

Long ago, I had the temerity to write about Delaware’s statutes concerning stockholder consents, Delaware’s Inadequate Protection of Shareholders


The FTB’s “doing business” trap for foreign LLCs with California managers, members or agents
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • April 8 2013

According to the California Franchise Tax Board, a limited liability company classified as a partnership must do all of the following: File Form


LLC has no First Amendment right to send its lawyer to board meetings
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • June 20 2013

Usually when someone invokes her right to counsel, she usually has in mind the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (or perhaps Article I, §


Don’t bank on being able to use “bank” in your corporate name
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 6 2013

"Bank" is a good example of a homonym (same spelling and pronunciation but different meaning), a homograph (same spelling but different meaning) and


California’s GO-Biz site bedeviled by errors and omissions
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • January 2 2013

According to the website, the California Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) was created "to serve as California's single


Bill would mandate indemnification of LLC agents
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • February 26 2013

California's current limited liability act permits indemnification of any person (including any manager, member, officer, employee, or agent of the