We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 195

NV SOS introduces sleek new B2G solution
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • November 29 2012

Even if you don’t make business filings in Nevada, I encourage you to check out the Nevada Secretary of State’s business portal SilverFlume


Officers and the Business Judgment Rule
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • July 17 2013

Recently, I came across the following assertion: First, other than the recent aberration of Poggetto v. Switzer , the BJR has never been applied to


The Arcana of dating stockholder consents
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 13 2013

Long ago, I had the temerity to write about Delaware’s statutes concerning stockholder consents, Delaware’s Inadequate Protection of Shareholders


Is Delaware’s hegemony over corporate law about to end?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2013

Ancient Greece was a coherent culture but not a coherent state. It was comprised of a many city states that vied with each other for ἡ&gamma


Can the DBP incorporate by reference a federal form?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • September 23 2013

Almost a year ago, the Commissioner of Corporations (now the Commissioner of Business Oversight) proposed to amend the custody rule, 10 CCR


Bill aims to free subversive organizations from registration law and NASAA shoots for mandatory Form D filings
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • April 1 2013

The California Subversive Organization Registration Law, Corporations Code Section 35000 et seq., has been on the books for decades. The law purports


County assessors assume a conversion involves a transfer, but are they correct?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 12 2013

When an entity converts into another business form, does a transfer occur? Many California Assessor's offices seem to think so. Therefore, don't be


I don’t want to express a preference, but I want my vote to count
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 5 2013

I've always considered majority voting to be a profoundly illogical concept that evidences a fundamental misunderstanding of the mechanics of


Why incorporation may be unconstitutional
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • April 29 2013

Section 25018 of the California Corporations Code provides a definition of several of the better known federal securities laws: "Securities Act of


Bill aims to make foreign nonqualified LLC contracts voidable
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2013

As discussed in prior posts, "transacting intrastate business" is not the same as "doing business". See You may Be Doing Business in California Even