We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 195

“Wherever you go, there you are”, but will you be in the proper county?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2013

The California General Corporation Law makes numerous references to the "proper county". For example, Corporations Code Section 304 empowers the


LLC has no First Amendment right to send its lawyer to board meetings
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • June 20 2013

Usually when someone invokes her right to counsel, she usually has in mind the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (or perhaps Article I, §


Would Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. have a stronger case as a flexible purpose corporation?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 11 2013

Steve Hazen alerted me to the fact that California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris has filed an amicus brief in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores


The Arcana of dating stockholder consents
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 13 2013

Long ago, I had the temerity to write about Delaware’s statutes concerning stockholder consents, Delaware’s Inadequate Protection of Shareholders


Is Delaware’s hegemony over corporate law about to end?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2013

Ancient Greece was a coherent culture but not a coherent state. It was comprised of a many city states that vied with each other for ἡ&gamma


Bill would mandate indemnification of LLC agents
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • February 26 2013

California's current limited liability act permits indemnification of any person (including any manager, member, officer, employee, or agent of the


What doth the alter ego doctrine require of thee, but to “do justice”?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • March 22 2013

Yesterday's post briefly discussed the internal affairs doctrine and alter ego claims. Professor Stephen Bainbridge responded with this post which


Must designated directors keep a secret?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • July 11 2013

Yesterday's post concerned the attorney-client privileged issues in Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster's recent decision in Kalisman v. Friedman, 2013


Nevada legislature may prohibit the establishment of corporations for “illicit purposes”
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • January 14 2013

Nevada's legislature meets in Regular Session every other year for 12o consecutive calendar days. Nev. Const. Art. II, 4 and NRS 218A.078


A good meal, a good time and a good securities offering?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • March 19 2012

A well-used sales technique is to offer prospective purchasers a free meal