We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 195

Must designated directors keep a secret?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • July 11 2013

Yesterday's post concerned the attorney-client privileged issues in Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster's recent decision in Kalisman v. Friedman, 2013


Directors may be invested with super powers in Nevada but not California
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • February 5 2013

Sometimes investors would like to endow one or more directors with greater voting powers. This is possible with a Nevada corporation by virtue of NRS


SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee pushes for oddly named “universal proxy ballots”
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 13 2013

In late July, the SEC's Investor Advisory Committee issued a recommendation that the SEC "explore relaxing the 'bona fide nominee' rule embodied in


Bill aims to free subversive organizations from registration law and NASAA shoots for mandatory Form D filings
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • April 1 2013

The California Subversive Organization Registration Law, Corporations Code Section 35000 et seq., has been on the books for decades. The law purports


“Wherever you go, there you are”, but will you be in the proper county?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2013

The California General Corporation Law makes numerous references to the "proper county". For example, Corporations Code Section 304 empowers the


The Arcana of dating stockholder consents
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 13 2013

Long ago, I had the temerity to write about Delaware’s statutes concerning stockholder consents, Delaware’s Inadequate Protection of Shareholders


Is Delaware’s hegemony over corporate law about to end?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2013

Ancient Greece was a coherent culture but not a coherent state. It was comprised of a many city states that vied with each other for ἡ&gamma


Bill would mandate indemnification of LLC agents
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • February 26 2013

California's current limited liability act permits indemnification of any person (including any manager, member, officer, employee, or agent of the


When is a gift a sale?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • February 22 2013

According to Black's Law Dictionary, a "gift" is a "voluntary transfer of property to another made gratuitously and without consideration". Thus, it


“Sweat equity” means no security
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • November 21 2012

There was no such thing as a limited liability company in 1933, 1934 or even 1968