We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 195

California’s new LLC Act call me laocoon, but I foresee a mess!
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • September 24 2012

On Friday, Governor Brown signed SB 323 (Vargas) into law


When officers must indemnify the corporation
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • June 7 2013

Much attention is focused on the power of corporations to indemnify corporate officers and other agents. In California, this is addressed by


The bulk sales law an unconscionable time a-dying
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2012

In February 1685, Charles II of England, aka the “Merry Monarch”, took ill and to his bed


Supreme Court holds California’s survival statute inapplicable to Delaware corporation
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2013

Section 278 of the Delaware General Corporation in effect limits suits against dissolved corporations to a period of three years from dissolution. In


Conversion is not so easy, and so smooth a thing . . .
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2013

Entity conversions are a relatively new phenomena. The legislature first provided for conversion in 1999 when it enacted AB 197 (Ackerman), which


I’ve been thinking about conversion, but I haven’t decided to convert
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2013

Conversion can be a sensitive subject for some. In California, corporate conversions are a relatively new phenomenon, having made their first appearance


Officers and the Business Judgment Rule
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • July 17 2013

Recently, I came across the following assertion: First, other than the recent aberration of Poggetto v. Switzer , the BJR has never been applied to


Move over Hester Prynne: if your company is delinquent, you may also be wearing a scarlet letter
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 10 2012

In 2006, then Assembly Member Jerome Horton authored AB 1418 to require the Board of Equalization and the Franchise Tax Board to make publicly available lists of the 250 largest tax delinquencies in excess of $100,000


Why incorporation may be unconstitutional
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • April 29 2013

Section 25018 of the California Corporations Code provides a definition of several of the better known federal securities laws: "Securities Act of


Bill aims to free subversive organizations from registration law and NASAA shoots for mandatory Form D filings
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • April 1 2013

The California Subversive Organization Registration Law, Corporations Code Section 35000 et seq., has been on the books for decades. The law purports