We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 866

FCC decides bulk billing and exclusive marketing arrangements in the provision of video services to MDUs should not be restricted
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • March 5 2010

On March 2, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission ("Commission") released a Second Report and Order ("Order") in MD Docket 07-51, declining to prohibit Multichannel Video Program Distributors ("MVPDs) from utilizing bulk billing or exclusive marketing arrangements in Multiple Dwelling Units ("MDUs"


Richmond casino case: how early is too early for CEQA?
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • March 15 2010

In Parchester Village Neighborhood Council v. City of Richmond, the California Court of Appeal recently held that the City of Richmond’s decision to enter into a Municipal Services Agreement (MSA) with a Native American tribe did not constitute a “project” requiring California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, even though the agreement effectively committed the City to a particular course of action


Southern District of New York hears oral argument on motion to dismiss in Gifford et al. v. USGBC
  • Arent Fox LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2011

This past Tuesday, July 26, U.S. District Court Judge Leonard Sand heard oral argument on USGBC’s motion to dismiss Henry Gifford’s amended complaint in Gifford et al. v. USGBC, still pending in the Southern District of New York


Suit challenging leed certification dismissed
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • September 12 2011

A U.S. District Court judge dismissed a lawsuit alleging that the U.S. Green Building Council violated the false advertising provision of the Lanham Act because the plaintiffs a building professional, an architect, and an engineer were not competitors and lacked standing to bring the suit without a demonstration of a damaged commercial interest


"Put your makeup on, fix your hair up pretty, and meet me tonight in Atlantic City."
  • Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC
  • USA
  • June 28 2011

Apparently there is more than fist bumping (pumping?) going on "down the Shore."


A primer for obtaining outdoor advertising sign permits along New Jersey’s limited access highways
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • October 17 2011

The billboard industry is highly regulated in New Jersey and in other states


Noteworthy cases in the United States Supreme Court’s 2011 term
  • Larkin Hoffman
  • USA
  • September 21 2011

The first Monday in October represents the start of a new term for the United States Supreme Court


Some comments on the Fair Housing Act and advertising
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2012

Earlier this week I got a question concerning how fair housing and advertising work together


Legislative update in Pennsylvania - November 2012
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • November 28 2012

House Bill No. 2595 proposes to amend what is known as the "Outdoor Advertising Control Act of 1971" (Act) by adding language to the Act that would further provide control criteria for the lighting of outdoor advertising signs pursuant to the Act


FTC and CFPB tell mortgage advertisers to watch their ads
  • Venable LLP
  • USA
  • November 29 2012

On November 19, the FTC announced that after reviewing hundreds of mortgage advertisements, it sent letters to 20 companies, including real estate agents, home builders, and lead generators, warning them that their ads may be deceptive