We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 58

Texas Court of Appeals Issues Important State Superfund Order
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • April 13 2016

In a "case of first impression," U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting in Austin, in TCEQ v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al., issued an


Crossed Circuits: Running Counter to Fifth and Tenth Circuit Rulings, Eighth Circuit Finds ICCTA Preempt Common Law Negligence Claims
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • January 4 2016

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has distinguished decisions from the Fifth and Tenth Circuit that appear, at first blush, to be in


“Reverse CEQA” Reversed- California Supreme Court Rejects CEQA Analysis of Impacts of the Environment on the Project
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • December 21 2015

In California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (December 17, 2015) (Case No. S213478) (CBIA v. BAAQMD


TX Supreme Court reverses "stigma ruling" contaminated property decision and postpones definitive ruling on availability of stigma damages
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • August 25 2014

On August 22, 2014, the Texas Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in the case of Houston Unlimited, Inc. Metal Processing v. Mel Acres


Did EPA overstep in applying soil vapor intrusion guidance to commercial buildings?
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • August 19 2013

In April 2013, U.S. EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response issued two guidance documents on soil vapor intrusion. One addresses general


Maryland to impose new Stormwater Remediation Fee; Virginia enacts Congestion Relief Fee
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2013

Lawmakers in Maryland and Virginia have approved the imposition of certain new fees on property owners in various jurisdictions. Maryland property


CERCLA dual standard hurts property owners, purchasers
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • August 8 2014

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act imposes strict liability for the costs of environmental contamination on


New superfund ruling: Supreme Court holds that CERCLA Section 9658 does not preempt state statutes of repose
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2014

The Supreme Court has issued its decision in the case of CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, et al., __ S. Ct. __ (June 9, 2014), argued April 23, 2014. The


EPA's new "institutional controls" guidance may raise issues in cleanups and transactions
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • June 6 2013

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently issued two guidelines with far-reaching implications for real estate transactions involving


Solar power: the sun also rises
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • December 7 2007

Going solar may finally make good business sense