We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 473

Apple-Samsung trade dress case demonstrates potential value of design patents
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • May 20 2015

A jury awarded Apple more than $1 billion in damages after finding that smartphones sold by Samsung diluted Apple's trade dress and infringed Apple's

Commission issues limited exclusion and cease and desist orders for trade secret theft in 887 investigation
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2015

On April 16, 2015, the Commission issued its Notice of Final Determination in Certain Crawler Cranes and Components Thereof, No. 337-TA-887, finding

Protecting fashion designs through IP law
  • Duane Morris LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2015

The fashion industry in the United States generates more than $300 billion in revenue each year. In addition to its substantial contributions to the

Court rules on post-trial motions following willful infringement verdict
  • Morris James LLP
  • USA
  • April 7 2015

Following a 5-day trial in April, 2014, the jury found the asserted patents valid and infringed. It found intentional trade dress infringement making

Many courts are reluctant to permit parties to redact filed documents, or to file them under seal, even when they contain trade secrets
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • March 25 2015

In a patent infringement case pending in a California federal court, the defendant moved for summary judgment. The parties jointly requested leave to

Jury awards $58.7 million for trade secret misappropriation after technology disclosure pursuant to NDA
  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • USA
  • March 11 2015

On March 6, in a U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case, Texas Advanced Optoelectric Solutions (TAOS) Inc. obtained a verdict

Takin’ bacon: trade secret case dismissed after patent filed
  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • USA
  • March 10 2015

A federal court in Minnesota rejected a company's misappropriation of trade secret claim, finding that the publication of a patent related to the

Federal Circuit upholds ITC’s authority to enforce consent order covering third-party products
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part a decision of the International Trade Commission (ITC, the

Diaper maker’s patent claims soiled by delay
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

This case relates to adult incontinence products. The district court, based on a delay of more than six-years in filing the lawsuit, held that the

Court crushes Krush’s motions for preliminary injunction on patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation
  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • USA
  • October 27 2014

Krush Communications, LLC ("Krush") brought suit in New Jersey in 2013 against Lunex Telecom, Inc., a Georgia corporation ("Lunex"), for patent