We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 748

Webinar recap! Enforcing Non-Compete Provisions in Franchise Agreements
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • November 25 2015

Happy Thanksgiving. As a thank you to our valued readers, we are pleased to announce the webinar "Enforcing Non-Compete Provisions in Franchise

Sixth Circuit differentiates trade secrets and confidential information under Texas law
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • November 23 2015

Last week, in a diversity jurisdiction case, the Sixth Circuit analyzed Texas law to identify the relationship among three separate categories of

Trend in the courts: it’s getting harder to obtain preliminary injunctions in restrictive covenant cases
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2015

In recent weeks, courts almost routinely have been denying preliminary injunctive relief in cases alleging violation of non-compete and similar

California Supreme Court to decide whether finding that UTSA claim was filed in bad faith can revive a previously dismissed malicious prosecution claim
  • Littler Mendelson
  • USA
  • November 17 2015

The California Supreme Court's recent decision to review the Second District Court of Appeals' ruling in Parrish v. Latham & Watkins, 238 Cal. App

Perspectives from the bench: a recap of the AIPLA Trade Secret Law Summit’s judicial panel
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • November 13 2015

Several members of Seyfarth's Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes Practice Group attended the AIPLA's annual Trade Secret Law Summit on

Trade secrets unwrapped: packaging materials case demonstrates the importance of keeping confidential information sealed shut
  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
  • USA
  • November 12 2015

There are many ways to gain trade secret protection, but also many ways to lose it. As the recent motion to dismiss ruling in Fleetwood Packaging v

Three of the most common misconceptions about enforcing Texas non-compete agreements.
  • Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC
  • USA
  • November 11 2015

When it comes to the enforceability of non-compete agreements in Texas, misconceptions and half-truths are abound. Whether I am having a conversation

“Reasonable suspicion” of trade secret misappropriation isn’t always enough
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • November 6 2015

Though an employer may be eager to bring a trade secret claim against former employees as soon as possible, filing suit before properly vetting the

“Red River Rivalry” reaches right to restrict employment
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • November 3 2015

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit opened its October 29th opinion in Cardoni v. Prosperity Bank by noting that "in addition

California Supreme Court will review malicious prosecution claim against Latham & Watkins
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • October 26 2015

On April 17, 2012 and September 3, 2014, we blogged about a malicious prosecution claim brought against Latham & Watkins in the Los Angeles Superior