We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 63

Pre-emption under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • December 9 2013

There are three important holdings from the recent California Court of Appeal opinion in Angelica Textile Services, Inc. v. Park, 220 Cal. App. 4th


Criminal conviction affirmed by Ninth Circuit for trade secret theft
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • November 12 2014

On November 5, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in an unpublished disposition, issued its opinion in U.S. v. Suibin


Failure to follow the court's preliminary injunction in a trade secrets case results in default
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • April 24 2014

In what turned out to be a disastrous result for defendants, a Massachusetts Court issued a default judgment against certain salespeople who left


California Supreme Court will review malicious prosecution claim against Latham & Watkins
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • October 26 2015

On April 17, 2012 and September 3, 2014, we blogged about a malicious prosecution claim brought against Latham & Watkins in the Los Angeles Superior


Eighth Circuit holds that a compilation of otherwise public information can be a trade secret
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • December 22 2011

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently held that compilations containing only minimal secret information nevertheless qualified for trade secret protection because the substantial investment involved in preparing them gave their owner a competitive advantage and because the owner undertook reasonable efforts to maintain their secrecy by labeling them with a proprietary legend and only distributing them to parties which signed a confidentiality agreement


California resident forced to litigate non-compete and trade secrets case in Illinois
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • May 20 2014

A threshold tactical decision in virtually every non-compete and trade secret case is where to file the suit. This decision is particularly important


Leave the source code behind
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • January 23 2015

U.S. Attorneys in many jurisdictions are more willingly stepping into the fray between financial services firms and their former employees who have


Keeping trade secrets secret is key
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • April 29 2013

Failure to protect corporate trade secrets had dire consequences for AGC, Inc., a Connecticut aviation component manufacturer forced to file a


“Red River Rivalry” reaches right to restrict employment
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • November 3 2015

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit opened its October 29th opinion in Cardoni v. Prosperity Bank by noting that "in addition


California Court of Appeal revisits CUTSA "preemption" of other tort claims
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • October 29 2013

California is one of the 47 states to have adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. Among other things, "CUTSA," as it is sometimes referred to in