We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 938

Copyright and Trademark Case Review
  • Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
  • USA
  • February 10 2016

The US Supreme Court granted certiorari without comment. The question presented in the petition for certiorari is “What is the appropriate standard

Trademark, Copyright & False Advertising Newsletter - Fall 2015
  • Kaye Scholer LLP
  • USA
  • November 30 2015

In an opinion by Judge Leval, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has upheld Google’s digitization program of full text copying

Aretha Franklin is looking for a little respect from Telluride and Toronto Film Festivals
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • September 22 2015

On September 4, 2015, a long running legal battle over the right to use footage from a 1972 concert by Aretha Franklin took a twist right out of a

And the winner is? Digital platform liability for trademark infringement
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • August 12 2015

Much has been made of the question of liability for the operation or furnishing of digital platforms in the copyright context. Since the U.S. Supreme

Court says “Twiharder” does not infringe “Twilight” trademarks
  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • USA
  • April 10 2015

A federal judge ruled that a parody of the "Twilight" movie series did not infringe the trademarks of the original, but allowed the case to proceed

Canadian internet law update 2014
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • USA
  • March 24 2015

Unicast SA v. South Asian Broadcasting Corp. Inc., 2014 FC 295, involved an application to expunge the respondent’s RED FM trademark registered

Trademark, copyright & false advertising newsletter - Winter 2015
  • Kaye Scholer LLP
  • USA
  • March 10 2015

Courts have long recognized that a trademark owner can make small changes to its mark without losing priority. This doctrineknown as

Supreme Court rules on “tacking” and district court distinguishes dish network from Aereo
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • January 22 2015

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court held that whether two trademarks may be tacked for purposes of determining priority is a question for the jury

Status updates - 16 January 2015
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • January 16 2015

The founder of the Lagunitas Brewing Company decided to drop a lawsuit that he’d filed against Sierra Nevada for trademark infringement after beer

Trademark, copyright & false advertising newsletter - Summer 2014
  • Kaye Scholer LLP
  • USA
  • September 11 2014

In Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate, Ltd., 755 F.3d 496 (7th Cir. 2014), in an opinion by Judge Posner, the Seventh Circuit clarified the interplay