We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,266

Patent trolls aren’t the only IP trolls in the forest: copyright trolls
  • Duane Morris LLP
  • USA
  • March 12 2013

Patent trolls - "non-practicing entities," which are companies that acquire patents with little or no intention of doing anything with the patents

What CLS Bank taketh, copyright may giveth back
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2014

Courts, commentators and clients will be struggling for some time to assess the impact on software patents of Thursday's Supreme Court decision in

Intellectual property weekly abstracts bulletin
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • May 22 2013

The Supreme Court has dismissed Eli Lilly of Canada Inc.’s leave on the issue, as summarized by the Court, as to whether the creation by the Federal

Fashion and Intellectual Property: Many Options to Protect Your Design, But No One-Stop Shop
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • May 30 2017

Imagine you’re a fashion designer with a unique clothing design. As with any other business, you wish to protect your intellectual property through

Newpoint Media seeks declaration of non-infringement of easy IP patent and copyrights covering custom advertisement creation
  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • USA
  • June 4 2014

NewPoint Media Group, LLC ("NewPoint Media"), filed a complaint in the Northern District of Georgia seeking a declaratory judgment against Easy

Supreme Court corner - September, 2014
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • USA
  • September 10 2014

In a unanimous (9-0) opinion authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Court held that the Federal Circuit’s indefiniteness standard bred “lower

Wait for it: “unreasonable delay” in bringing suit is no longer a defense in patent cases
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2017

The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a 7-1 ruling in SCA Hygiene that eliminated the common-law defense of laches in patent infringement cases

Ten new Supreme Court opinions reshaping the intellectual-property landscape
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • August 25 2014

Thirty years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court heard between 150 and 175 cases each year, but rarely accepted an intellectual-property case for review

Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. - Setting the Common Law’s Limits on the Rights of Patent and Copyright Owners
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • June 5 2017

Last week, in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., Case No. 15-1189 (May 30, 2017), the Supreme Court ruled that under the

Three standards for standing under the Lanham Act, but only one will survive Supreme Court review
  • Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
  • USA
  • June 10 2013

The Supreme Court has announced that it will hear arguments as to whether Static Control Components has standing under the Lanham Act to bring false