We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,166

Intellectual property weekly abstracts bulletin
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • May 22 2013

The Supreme Court has dismissed Eli Lilly of Canada Inc.’s leave on the issue, as summarized by the Court, as to whether the creation by the Federal


Does ‘Raging Bull’ deliver knockout to patent laches defense?
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • February 10 2015

Under Federal Circuit case law, patent-infringement defendants may assert the laches defense an equitable defense barring claims brought after an


Laches is a defense to patent infringement, for now
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • December 23 2014

Laches has long been a defense to patent infringement. Laches exists when the patent holder unreasonably and inexcusably delays in filing a patent


En banc Federal Circuit holds that “laches remains a defense to legal relief in a patent infringement suit”
  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • USA
  • September 18 2015

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, earlier today held that "laches remains a defense to legal relief in a patent


En banc Federal Circuit maintains laches defense with post-suit twist (SCA v. First Quality)
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • September 18 2015

Today, in SCA v. First Quality, the Federal Circuit sitting en banc ruled that the equitable doctrine of laches remains a valid defense in patent


Supreme Court Corner - Q4 2016
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • USA
  • December 20 2016

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) protects web-based multimedia-sharing services, such as YouTube, from copyright infringement liability if


What CLS Bank taketh, copyright may giveth back
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2014

Courts, commentators and clients will be struggling for some time to assess the impact on software patents of Thursday's Supreme Court decision in


Patent litigation delays after the "Raging Bull" decision: how deep into IP law will the Supreme Court’s knockout punch to copyright laches resonate?
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2015

"Laches is a clement doctrine," the Federal Circuit wrote more than 20 years ago. "It assures that old grievances will some day be laid to rest, that


WhitServe LLC v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.: laches remains a viable defense to patent infringement allegations
  • Haug Partners LLP
  • USA
  • August 6 2015

On July 20, 2015, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in WhitServe LLC v. GoDaddy.com, Inc. rejected an alleged


Copyright for Engineered DNA (Part 2)
  • GQ Life Sciences
  • USA
  • March 1 2016

With the United States Supreme Court ruling in Myriad, the enforceability of certain claims in existing gene patents and the broader patentability of