We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 995

Patent litigation delays after the "Raging Bull" decision: how deep into IP law will the Supreme Court’s knockout punch to copyright laches resonate?
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2015

"Laches is a clement doctrine," the Federal Circuit wrote more than 20 years ago. "It assures that old grievances will some day be laid to rest, that


Three standards for standing under the Lanham Act, but only one will survive Supreme Court review
  • Arnold & Porter LLP
  • USA
  • June 10 2013

The Supreme Court has announced that it will hear arguments as to whether Static Control Components has standing under the Lanham Act to bring false


Law firm targeted by science publisher answers copyright infringement complaint
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 3 2012

The law firm that was sued for copying and disseminating copyrighted articles from scientific journals for submission with its clients’ patent applications to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has filed its response to the copyright infringement claims


Kreative Power, LLC v. Monoprice, Inc.
  • Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox
  • USA
  • May 21 2015

On June 26, 2014, Kreative Power, LLC sued Monoprice, Inc. for infringement of two patents and a copyright owned by Kreative. One of the patents was


Korean War Memorial sculptor wins over $540,000 in damages for postage stamp infringements
  • Arnstein & Lehr LLP
  • USA
  • August 12 2015

In 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the government was liable for infringing the copyright held by sculptor Frank


Ten new Supreme Court opinions reshaping the intellectual-property landscape
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • August 25 2014

Thirty years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court heard between 150 and 175 cases each year, but rarely accepted an intellectual-property case for review


MOFO IP Quarterly - Summer 2014
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • July 11 2014

The Supreme Court heard a record-breaking six patent cases in the 2013-2014 Term. By contrast, the high court heard only three patent cases in each


Supreme Court corner - September, 2014
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • USA
  • September 10 2014

In a unanimous (9-0) opinion authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Court held that the Federal Circuit’s indefiniteness standard bred “lower


Laches can still be used to bar legal remedies, rules Federal Circuit
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • October 5 2015

On September 18 2015 a sharply divided en banc Federal Circuit issued a decision (six to five) in SCA Hygiene Products v First Quality Baby Products


WhitServe LLC v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.: laches remains a viable defense to patent infringement allegations
  • Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP
  • USA
  • August 6 2015

On July 20, 2015, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in WhitServe LLC v. GoDaddy.com, Inc. rejected an alleged