We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 991

Three standards for standing under the Lanham Act, but only one will survive Supreme Court review
  • Arnold & Porter LLP
  • USA
  • June 10 2013

The Supreme Court has announced that it will hear arguments as to whether Static Control Components has standing under the Lanham Act to bring false

The Supreme Court continues to take on IP issues; is Congress picking up the patent reform torch again too?
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • November 18 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to hear two patent-related cases, as well as a copyright case. The copyright case, Petrella v

Standing out: the Supreme Court eases standard for awarding attorney’s fees in patent cases
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • May 1 2014

In a pair of decisions concerning the recovery of attorney's fees in patent litigation, the Supreme Court rejected the current criteria for both

Fair use ruling for patent-prosecution firm’s article copying
  • Briggs and Morgan
  • USA
  • August 8 2013

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Keyes recently issued a Report and Recommendation granting summary judgment of fair use in a case that involves a copyright

Supreme Court corner Q1 2014
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • USA
  • March 26 2014

Does a company “publicly perform” a copyrighted television program when it retransmits a broadcast of that program to paid subscribers over the

One size doesn’t fit all
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2012

Design patents, trade dress and copyrights each have different requirements, resulting in the need for a multi-faceted approach

Science publisher claims submission of prior art to USPTO involves copyright infringement
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • March 15 2012

A New Jersey-based publishing company has filed copyright infringement lawsuits in federal courts in two states against law firms that submitted citations to or copies of copyrighted articles from scientific journals to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) with their clients’ patent applications

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • January 20 2012

Plaintiff owner of copyright in “Java,” a software platform, brought suit against defendant owner of Android, a competing software platform designed for mobile computing devices, claiming infringement of its patents and copyrighted works related to incremental improvements to the efficiency and security of the Java system

Arbitration victory for Toshiba
  • Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2011

The firm recently won a complete victory for Toshiba Corporation in an AAAICDR arbitration in New York

Jury rules that Google infringed copyright: but was it fair?
  • Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP
  • USA
  • May 18 2012

A Californian jury has ruled that the Android mobile platform, which is operated by Google Inc, infringes copyright relating to the Java programming language, which is owned by Oracle Corp