We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,008

US Supreme Court sets forth standing requirement for Lanham Act Section 43(a) false advertising claims, rejecting requirement of direct competition
  • Kaye Scholer LLP
  • USA
  • March 26 2014

Significant for litigators and would-be litigants alike, the US Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control

The Supreme Court continues to take on IP issues; is Congress picking up the patent reform torch again too?
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • November 18 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to hear two patent-related cases, as well as a copyright case. The copyright case, Petrella v

One size doesn’t fit all
  • Locke Lord LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2012

Design patents, trade dress and copyrights each have different requirements, resulting in the need for a multi-faceted approach

Patent litigation delays after the "Raging Bull" decision: how deep into IP law will the Supreme Court’s knockout punch to copyright laches resonate?
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2015

"Laches is a clement doctrine," the Federal Circuit wrote more than 20 years ago. "It assures that old grievances will some day be laid to rest, that

Amini sues Yuan Tai Enterprises - again
  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • USA
  • July 7 2014

Amini Innovation Corporation ("AICO") filed suit on June 30, 2014 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (AICO's

MOFO IP Quarterly - Summer 2014
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • July 11 2014

The Supreme Court heard a record-breaking six patent cases in the 2013-2014 Term. By contrast, the high court heard only three patent cases in each

Special considerations for patent exhaustion in software-related inventions
  • Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • USA
  • March 10 2014

Innovation makes it easier than ever for international communities to come closer together. Much of this innovation is in the form of software

Supreme Court watch: copyright and patent cases granted certiorari
  • Leydig Voit & Mayer Ltd
  • USA
  • February 5 2014

Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. to resolve a circuit court split regarding the use of laches, or time limits on the right to sue, in copyright cases

Supreme Court rules Raging Bull claims not down for the count a follow-up post
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • May 20 2014

As mentioned in our blog yesterday, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Petrella v. MGM. The case raised the issue of whether the equitable

Jury rules that Google infringed copyright: but was it fair?
  • Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP
  • USA
  • May 18 2012

A Californian jury has ruled that the Android mobile platform, which is operated by Google Inc, infringes copyright relating to the Java programming language, which is owned by Oracle Corp