We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 80

Copyright management information must be on same web page
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • October 15 2012

Judge Kendall denied plaintiff Personal Keepsakes’ (“PKI”) motion to reconsider in this copyright and Digital Millenium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) case


Copyright plaintiff must justify Doe suit or faces dismissal
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • September 17 2012

Judge Shadur sua sponte gave plaintiff AF Holdings ten days to provide a further showing justifying its suit against an anonymous John Doe in this copyright infringement suit


Copyright agreement does not create federal question jurisdiction
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 17 2012

Judge Shadur sua sponte remanded plaintiff’s breach of contract case to the Cook County state court


Default judgment requires damages prove-up
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 31 2012

Judge Shadur acknowledged that pro se plaintiff’s motion for default was timely in this copyright infringement case


Court reminds plaintiff of Rule 11 obligation in adult movie download case
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 24 2012

Judge Kim denied two Doe defendants’ motions to quash subpoenas to their Internet service providers in this copyright case involving BitTorrent downloads of adult movies as part of a “swarm.”


Theft of lyrics not relevant to copyright infringement case
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2012

Judge St. Eve denied a Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 motion to intervene by Romano in this copyright case


Court orders Doe disclosure after time to object
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 13 2012

Judge Leinenweber granted plaintiff Pacific Century International’s (“PCI”) Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c)(2)(B) motion to compel subpoena compliance, in this BitTorrent copyright suit


Repeated improper filings may lead to dismissal
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • September 5 2012

Judge Shadur sua sponte issued an order requiring pro se plaintiff to appear and answer the Court’s questions regarding whether plaintiff’s filings met the Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b) requirement of objective good faith based upon a series of events in the case including: Plaintiff brought her copyright infringement claims despite an arbitration clause in its publishing agreement with defendant Lulu.com


No sanctions where conduct was addressed in earlier motion to compel
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 11 2012

Judge Norgle denied plaintiff’s sanctions motion in this copyright case


Prevailing party fees requires actually prevailing
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 23 2012

Judge Norgle awarded defendant Chicago Gridiron its costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 in this copyright case