We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-6 of 6

Supreme Court finds hedging process ineligible for patent
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP
  • USA
  • August 1 2010

In Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. ___ (2010), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a hedging process developed for buyers and sellers of commodities in the energy market wasn't eligible for a patent

Alison E. Lothes
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP

Telisport W. Putsavage
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP

Van P. Hilderbrand, Jr.
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP

David A. Handler
  • Sullivan & Worcester LLP