We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,517

Supreme Court Corner - Q4 2016
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • USA
  • December 20 2016

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) protects web-based multimedia-sharing services, such as YouTube, from copyright infringement liability if


At two, Alice toddles along
  • Banner & Witcoff Ltd
  • USA
  • December 20 2016

Since the two-year anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014), the Alice framework for


Life sciences quarterly newsletter - December 2016
  • Eversheds
  • Austria, Belgium, European Union, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, USA
  • December 15 2016

In Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics Co. Ltd v AbbVie Biotechnology Limited 2016 EWHC 425 (Pat) (1 March 2016), the English Patents Court refused to strike


Arbitration Without Law: Choice of Law in FRAND Disputes
  • Yigal Arnon & Co
  • Global, USA
  • November 15 2016

Recent arbitration between InterDigital and Huawei seems to demonstrate the purported advantages of arbitration as a means of dispute resolution


The Federal Circuit Muddies The 101 Waters After BASCOM
  • Haynes and Boone LLP
  • USA
  • November 11 2016

On September 30, 2016, in Intellectual Ventures I LLC, v. Symantec Corp., No. 15-1769, 15-1770, 15-1771, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit


Lottery and Gaming Patents Survive Invalidity Challenge By Claiming Location Feature
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • November 8 2016

In CG Technology Development, LLC, et al. v. BWIN.Party, Inc. et al., (Case No. 2:16-cv-00871-RCJ-VCF, D. Nev. 2016), the patents-in-suit relate to


Barry v. Medtronic: District Court Orders Strict Limits on Social Media Contacts with Potential Jurors
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 1 2016

As the patent infringement case between Mark Barry, M.D. ("Barry") and Medtronic approached trial, the district court informed the parties that it


Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Apple-Samsung Patent Case
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • October 14 2016

During oral arguments on Tuesday, justices of the U.S. Supreme Court grappled with the appropriate standard by which to assess damages for


Streaming Under 101: No Affinity for Patent Against Music Store App
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 6 2016

In Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al., No. 15-2080 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 23, 2016), the Federal Circuit affirmed another invalidity


비자명성(Non-Obviousness)에 의한 거절이유가 2 부족할 때
  • Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • South Korea, USA
  • October 4 2016

미국 특허법에서 35 U.S.C. 103은 특허를 받는 기술이 종래의 기술에 비추어 보았을 때 해당 분야의 통상의 기술을 가진 자에게 자명(obvious)하지 않을 것을 요구합니다. 이것은 세상에 이미 알려진 바와 비교했을 때 너무 “뻔한” 기술한테는 특허라는