We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,382

Texas Court of Appeals Refuses to Recognize Patent Agent Privilege
  • Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP
  • USA
  • August 17 2016

In In re Silver, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas refused to recognize an attorney-client privilege for communications

Federal Circuit Expanding Interpretation of Step Two of the Test for Patent Eligibility
  • White & Case LLP
  • USA
  • August 4 2016

The Federal Circuit recently reversed a district court's decision granting a motion to dismiss a patent under 35 U.S.C. 101 in Bascom Global

BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp. (decided June 27, 2016)
  • Workman Nydegger
  • USA
  • July 28 2016

BASCOM sued AT&T for infringement of BASCOM’s U.S. Patent No. 5,987,606. The case was dismissed by the District Court on the grounds that the claims

Federal Circuit Finds BASCOM Internet Content Filtering Claims Patent Eligible
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • July 26 2016

In another decision applying the two-step framework for determining patent eligible subject matter laid out in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International

CAFC Dissects Alice Patent Eligibility Analysis in Bascom Global Internet Services
  • Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • USA
  • July 19 2016

This case arose on an appeal from the grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, with the district court finding the asserted claims

Online Merchandise Customization Methods Were Not Patentable
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 6 2016

Judge Darrah granted defendant Zazzle’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff American Needle’s patent claims to methods for selling

Bascom v. AT&T Mobility: Fodder for arguments on patent eligibility
  • Frost Brown Todd LLC
  • USA
  • July 5 2016

Last week, in the case of Bascom Global Internet Services v. AT&T Mobility LLC, the Federal Circuit handed down an opinion reversing a decision by

District Court Denies Leave to Amend to Add Implied License Affirmative Defense Where Motion for Leave Was Filed Just Two Months Prior to Fact Discovery Cut-Off
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 5 2016

Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC (collectively "Google") filed a motion for leave to amend their answer to include an implied license affirmative

Design Patents - Could a “Real” Design Solve a “Virtual” Problem? Protecting Innovative Design Against Physical or Online Infringing Products
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2016

Want to buy a Porsche 911 for only $159? Well, now you can. Or at least you can buy the virtual 3-D model of a Porsche 911 to 3-D print or to use in

Federal Circuit Construes Claim Term in a Manner that Rendered Claim Language Superfluous
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • May 26 2016

In SimpleAir, Inc. v. Sony Ericsson Mobile Commc'ns AB, Appeal No. 2015-1251, the Federal Circuit vacated the district court's judgment of