We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,110

Claims to generic method and system for using a web browser’s back and forward buttons without data loss are not patent eligible
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • June 24 2015

Federal Circuit affirms Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal based on invalidity under section 101. The patent was directed to a method of using of a web


Alice one year later litigation trends in districts courts and the PTAB
  • Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • USA
  • June 10 2015

Almost one year ago, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice v. CLS Bank, a decision that fundamentally changed the way software claims are


Covered business method patent held invalid under 35 USC 101 and Alice
  • Briggs and Morgan
  • USA
  • May 22 2015

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has issued a Final Written Decision of the invalidity of an Internet-related patent under the subject matter


eBay gets patent infringement case tossed under Alice
  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • USA
  • April 24 2015

In an order dated March 27, 2015, a US district judge in San Diego granted eBay's motion for judgement on the pleadings and threw out an action


“Upselling” patent case against Amazon dismissed
  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • USA
  • April 16 2015

On March 25, 2015, a federal judge in Delaware dismissed a patent infringement case against Amazon.com Inc., saying that the patent at issue covered


Apple ordered to pay $533m in iTunes patent infringement case
  • Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC
  • USA
  • March 19 2015

A federal jury in Texas found that Apple's iTunes infringed three patents held by Smartflash LLC and awarded Smartflash over half a billion dollars


The Federal Circuit limits the use of the patent exhaustion defense to "authorized acquirers"
  • Brinks Gilson & Lione
  • USA
  • March 13 2015

On February 10, 2015, the Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit in Helferich Patent Licensing v. NY Times and JCPenneyreversed a district court


Wireless does not mean “without wires”; “streaming video” does not mean emailing a video file
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 25 2015

Reviewing a final written decision of U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board), finding application claims unpatentable, the U.S. Court of


CAFC rules on patent exhaustion
  • Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
  • USA
  • February 10 2015

The patents-in-suit are directed to sending text messages with a link to a website, and a user can click on the link to retrieve content from the


Internet activity claims are valid subject matter
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • January 26 2015

In DDR HOLDINGS, LLC v. HOTELS.COM, L.P., Appeal No. 2013-1505, the Federal Circuit held Internet-activity claims recited patentable subject matter