We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 114

Frosty the patent? Fun holiday reading for patent geeks
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • December 22 2011

If you’re looking for a fun patent to read this holiday season (and who isn’t?), here’s one for “Apparatus for Facilitating the Construction of a Snow ManWoman.”


Highlights of the USPTO first-inventor-to-file rule
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • February 14 2013

The USPTO has published its long-awaited first-to-file rules and examination guidelines, which will take effect March 16, 2013. The new rules will


Judge Andrews grants in substantial part defendants' motion to dismiss IP venture's claims of indirect infringement and willfulness
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • January 12 2013

By Memorandum Order entered in IPVenture Inc. v. Lenovo Group, Limited, et al., Civil Action No. 11-588-RGA (D.Del., January 8, 2013), the Honorable


IP rules the world
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • October 13 2010

Interesting article in the New York Times this morning reports that Silicon Valley companies in the business of developing solar panels have been beaten to market by the Chinese, and that the Chinese are driving down prices and margins while the U.S. companies are struggling to gain enough efficiencies to enable them to compete


New social media website seeks to improve the patent examination process through crowdsourced Q&A, prior art submissions
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • September 26 2012

A new social networking site developed with USPTO input provides a forum for subject matter experts to post questions and answers about the U.S. patent system, along with prior art that may be relevant to pending patent applications


Judge Griesa overturns jury verdict for second time
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • September 20 2012

After a second jury trial for patent infringement, Judge Griesa of the Southern District of New York granted defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law as to non-infringement of the two patents in suit, in Hypoxico, Inc. v. Colorado Altitude Training LLC, No. 02-CV-6191, slip op. (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 28, 2012


Judge Stark grants British Telecommunication's motion to amend complaint to add new alleged infringement claims against Google
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • September 29 2012

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Leonard P


No end to litigation
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • November 1 2012

The Central District of California continues to be at the forefront of IP practice


Judge Stark denies defendants' motion for summary judgment of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. 305
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • November 9 2012

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Exelis Inc. v. Cellco Partnership, et al., C.A. No. 09-190-LPS (D.Del., November 6, 2012), the Court issued its rulings on several motions for summary judgment and Daubert motions filed by plaintiff and defendants


Motion to compel noninfringementinvalidity contentions premature where discovery outstanding from both parties
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • September 11 2012

Magistrate Judge Lindsay of the Eastern District of New York denied as premature plaintiff's motion to compel defendant's response to contention interrogatories concerning invalidity and noninfringement defenses where plaintiff had not yet repsonded to all of defedant's discovery demands and substantial discovery remained to be exchanged between the parties, in Carson Optical, Inc. v. Prym Consumer USA, Inc