We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 114

Judge Robinson grants in part and denies in part defendants' motion for judgment on pleadings in patent infringement action
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • December 8 2012

By Memorandum Order entered by The Honorable Sue L. Robinson in Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., et el. v. Lupin Limited, et al., Civil Action No. 11-271-SLR (Consol.) (D.Del., December 7, 2012), the Court granted in part and denied in part defendants Lupin’s Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings


Judge Thynge grants in part and denies in significant part the bill of costs of Amazon after adjudication in its favor
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2012

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable May Pat Thynge in Cordance Corporation v. Amazon.com, Inc., Civil Action No. 06-491-MPT (D.Del., April 11, 2012), the Court granted in part and denied in part the bill of costs of defendant Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”) after adjudication in its favor on the patent infringement claims filed against it by plaintiff Cordance Corporation (“Cordance”


Judge Andrews grants in substantial part defendants' motion to dismiss IP venture's claims of indirect infringement and willfulness
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • January 12 2013

By Memorandum Order entered in IPVenture Inc. v. Lenovo Group, Limited, et al., Civil Action No. 11-588-RGA (D.Del., January 8, 2013), the Honorable


USPTO seeking to improve quality of patents
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • February 7 2013

In one of his final posts on the USPTO Director's Forum Blog, departing director David Kappos presented some eye-opening statistics about patent


New USPTO guidance discusses patent-eligibility of inventions involving laws of nature
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • July 5 2012

A new USPTO guidance memorandum describes how the USPTO will review patent-eligibility of process claims for biotechnology inventions in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo v. Prometheus


Large entity, small entity or micro-entity: which one are you?
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • July 16 2012

In May, the USPTO issued a proposed rule that will set fees for patent applicants who qualify as “micro-entities.”


Chief Judge Sleet denies Apple's motion to transfer patent infringement action
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • November 30 2012

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in Smart Audio Technologies, LLC v. Apple, Inc., Civil Action No. 12-134-GMS (D.Del., November 16, 2012), the Court denied Apple’s motion to transfer the action to the Northern District of California


Changes to U.S. design patent law will extend term of design patents, provide international filing options
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • December 11 2012

On December 5, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act, which will implement several significant changes to U.S. design patent law when approved by President Obama


Frosty the patent? Fun holiday reading for patent geeks
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • December 22 2011

If you’re looking for a fun patent to read this holiday season (and who isn’t?), here’s one for “Apparatus for Facilitating the Construction of a Snow ManWoman.”


Executive order declares December 24, 2012 a federal holiday
  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • USA
  • December 23 2012

President Obama has issued an executive order that closes all executive branch offices and agencies on Monday, December 24, 2012. For the patent and