We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 691

District Court Orders Production of Bills from Expert Witnesses But Permits Redaction of Narrative Statements in Bills
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 19 2016

In this patent infringement action, the defendant, Ericsson moved to compel the plaintiff, TCL, to produce bills and invoices for worked performed by


Subsequent Employment Agreement Assigning Inventor's Intellectual Property Rights Does not Defeat Standing for Inventions Created Prior to Employment Agreement
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 14 2016

The plaintiff, Odyssey Wireless ("Odyssey") filed four separate actions for patent infringement against Defendants Apple, Samsung, LG, and Motorola


Recent Decision in Halo Requires Reconsideration of Summary Judgment Motion on Willfulness
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 12 2016

In a multi-district litigation, the district court had previously granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants on the issue of willful


District Court Permits Survey Evidence to Support Lost Profits Damage Theory
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 7 2016

The defendants', Roland DGA Corporation and Roland DG Corporation (collectively "Roland"), filed a motion for summary judgment against plaintiff


District Court Denies Leave to Amend to Add Implied License Affirmative Defense Where Motion for Leave Was Filed Just Two Months Prior to Fact Discovery Cut-Off
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 5 2016

Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC (collectively "Google") filed a motion for leave to amend their answer to include an implied license affirmative


After Halo, District Court Concludes that Jury's Finding of Willfulness Is Still Appropriate
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2016

After a jury trial finding American Technical Ceramics Corp. ("ATC) willfully infringed Presidio Component's ("Presidio") patent, ATC filed a motion


After Inventor Dies, Patent Infringement Lawsuit Is Dismissed for Lack of Standing on Court's Own Motion
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2016

Chris Tavantzis and ChrisTrikes Custom Motorcycles, Inc. ("ChrisTrikes") filed a complaint against a number of individuals and entities that


District Court Denies Agreed Upon Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction Where Parties Failed to Submit Consent and Injunction within 60 Days after Dismissal
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2016

After the parties settled the lawsuit, the district court dismissed the case without prejudice, subject to the right of any party to re-open the


District Court Declines Parties Joint Motion to Sever New Defendant from Pending Action
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • June 20 2016

In this patent infringement action, the parties filed a joint motion to request that the district court sever Defendant Contour, LLC ("Contour") from


After a Jury Trial Determining that the Defendant Infringed Several Valid Patents, the District Court Certified the Partial Judgment for Appeal Prior to a Trial on Damages Because the PTAB Had Found One of the Patents Invalid
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • June 15 2016

Plaintiffs asserted that defendants infringed several patents. The district court bifurcated liability and damages for all four patent infringement