We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 724

District Court Orders Modification of Protective Order to Allow Plaintiff to Use Defendant's Confidential Information in Opposing Inter Partes Review ("IPR")
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 6 2016

Defendant Baker Hughes Incorporated ("Baker Hughes") filed five inter partes review ("IPR") proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board


District Court Orders Production of Past Testing from Prior Litigations Despite Confidentiality of Third Parties
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 1 2016

Dexcel filed a motion to compel contending that Takeda has refused to provide any fact discovery concerning Takeda's methods for particle size


District Court Grants Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories Even Though Interrogatories Contained Discrete Subpart Where There was only One Accused Product
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 29 2016

Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys") filed a motion to compel defendant, ATopTech, to respond to interrogatories. ATopTech opposed the motion by


District Court Orders Additional Deposition of Defendant after Witness Changed Numerous Deposition Answers in Errata
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 23 2016

The plaintiff, Chrimar Systems Inc. and Chrimar ("Chrimar") filed a motion to compel an additional deposition of Defendant D-Link Systems, Inc.'s


District Court Warns Plaintiff That If It Narrows Its Case Too Close to Trial, It Will Have Its Trial Time Reduced
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 21 2016

During the pretrial conference, the Plaintiff Arthrex("Arthrex") told the district court that it may be able to narrow its case once the district


District Court Orders Additional Claim Construction Briefing After Plaintiff Appeared to Argue a Different Position in Other Litigation
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 17 2016

After the district court conducted a claim construction hearing (but before it issued an order), the district court stayed the litigation between


Core Wireless v. LG: District Court Orders Enhanced Damages Based on Defendant's Licensing Discussions
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 15 2016

A jury returned a verdict finding that LG infringed the claims of the patent-in-suit and that the claims were not invalid. The jury also found that


District Court Stays Patent Litigation Pending State Court Proceedings That Will Determine Licensing Issue
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 10 2016

In this patent infringement action, MMEI, owns U.S. patent 6,234,099 ("the '099 patent"). Fineline Industries, Inc. ("Fineline Inc.") entered into a


District Court Precludes Defendant from Referring to Plaintiff's Past Settlements as "Nuisance Value" But Allows Amount of Such Settlements
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 8 2016

As this patent infringement proceeded closer to trial, the parties filed various motions in limine. The plaintiff, PerDiemco, filed a motion in limine


District Court Orders Plaintiff to Produce Factual Support for Infringement Contentions Regardless of Work Product Doctrine
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • November 3 2016

Huawei and Blackberry filed motions to compel seeking the factual material that the plaintiff, SPH, had relied upon to support its infringement