We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 648

District Court Grants Motion to Exclude Proceeding before PTAB during IPR But Allows Admissions and Arguments Made to PTAB to go before the Jury
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 8 2016

The plaintiff, Magna, filed a motion in limine to exclude references to Inter Partes Review ("IPR") proceedings. The defendant, TRW, filed a response


Defendants' Motion Seeking to Depose Opposing Counsel Denied Where Defendants Could Not Show That Information Was Unavailable from Another Source
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2016

After the plaintiff filed suit against the defendants for patent infringement, the defendants contended that they uncovered during discovery a series


District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss under Section 101 Even Though Two Other District Courts Had Founds Patents Ineligible
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 2 2016

In this patent infringement action, the Defendants filed motions for partial summary judgment of invalidity with respect to two of the patents at


Evidence of Copying Admissible in Patent Infringement Trial to Prove Nonobviousness
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

Metaswitch moved to exclude evidence of copying from a patent infringement action filed against it by Genband. Genband asserted during the pretrial


District Court Rules Plaintiff Need Not Come Forward with Evidence of Priority Date Earlier than Patent Application Until Defendant Produces Clear and Convincing Evidence of Invalidating Prior Art and Summary Chart Is Not Sufficient
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 26 2016

Omega Patents, LLC ("Omega") filed a patent infringement action against CalAmp Corp. ("CalAmp") asserting that CalAmp infringes the claims of U.S


District Court Declines to Stay Action Pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR") Where Claim Construction Briefing Had Already Occurred
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 21 2016

After the PTAB granted Defendant's petition for IPR on certain of the claims in the patent-in-suit, the defendant filed a motion to stay the action


District Court Strikes Expert Opinion Testimony on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Under Section 101
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 19 2016

Defendants Metaswitch Networks Ltd and Metaswitch Networks Corp. ("Metaswitch") filed a motion to strike plaintiff's expert opinions of Mr. Lanning


Expert Patent Valuation Opinion Based on Forward Citation Analysis Survives Daubert Challenge
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 13 2016

Plaintiff Better Mouse Company's ("Better Mouse") filed a motion to strike portions of the rebuttal expert report and exclude testimony of Richard


District court denies request for contempt where defendant continued to provide repairs and replacement parts to enjoined devices
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2016

Plaintiff Advanced Transit Dynamics, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "ATD") filed an ex parte application for a judgment of civil contempt against Defendant


District Court Denies Accounting and Ongoing Royalty Where Jury Instructions Told Jury to Award Damages That Would Put Patent Holder in Same Financial Position Had Infringement Not Occurred
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 31 2015

Prism brought suit against Sprint alleging patent infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,127,345 and 8,387,155 (the "Asserted Patents"). After the jury