We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 579

PTAB rejects Samsung's bid to join its own previously initiated IPR proceeding as an unjustified "second bite at the apple"
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

In IPR2015-00821, Petitioner Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., sought to join its Petition with a recently


District court orders submission of expert reports on damages to determine proper usage of entire market value rule
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 18 2015

Invista North America S.A. R.L. ("Invistia") filed a patent infringement action against M&G USA Corporation ("M&G"). As the case progressed toward


The PTAB allows discovery "of persons who provided direction to, or had the authority to provide direction to, petitioner or its counsel in relation to this proceeding"
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 15 2015

In IPR2014-01201, Patent Owner ThermoLife International, LLC sought discovery regarding whether Purus Labs, Inc., a company related to the Petitioner


Motion for judgment on the pleadings based on Section 101 denied where defendant failed to include challenge in invalidity contentions
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 13 2015

In this patent infringement action between Plaintiffs Good Technology Corporation and Good Technology Software, Inc. ("Good) and Defendant MobileIron


District court denies motion to compel and for sanctions where CFO could not be compelled to testify on broad deposition topics including royalties, affirmative defenses, infringement contentions and invalidity contentions
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 11 2015

Plaintiff Stoneeagle Services, Inc. ("Stoneeagle") filed a motion seeking sanctions against Defendant Premier Healthcare Exchange, Inc. ("PHX") for


BBQ patent must face the heat: petition is not barred when filed within 1 year of the filing of a waiver of service in the district court
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2015

On October 13, 2014, The Brinkman Corporation filed a petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent 8,381,712 directed to a barbecue grill that


Another one bites the dust: action dismissed for lack of standing where plaintiff could not prove ownership of the patent-in-suit
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2015

America's Collectibles Network ("ACN") filed a patent infringement action in which it claimed to own U.S. Patent No. 8,370,211 (the "211 Patent"). It


Patent owner must produce documents that are inconsistent with its positions
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2015

In IPR2014-00727, Petitioner C&D Zodiac, Inc. seeks review of U.S. Patent No. 8,590,838 owned by BE Aerospace, Inc. The '838 patent relates to a


Fairchild v. Power Integrations: because of right to appeal, district court precludes reference to pending reexamination proceedings even though PTO had rejected all claims
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corp.'s (collectively, "Fairchild") moved in limine to preclude any reference to any pending


District court denies motion to stay pending inter partes review where trial was less than a year away and defendant's previous attempts at re-examination were unsuccessful
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • April 29 2015

Presidio Components, Inc. ("Presidio") filed a complaint against American Technical Ceramics Corp. ("ATC") asserting a claim for patent infringement