We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 1,543

Suggestion of Control Not Enough for RPI Challenge; Nexus Matters for Commercial Success
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

Addressing the real parties-in-interest (RPI) requirement for inter partes review (IPR) and the “nexus” requirement for commercial success to rebut an


IPR Survives Despite Petitioner Failure to Name All Real Parties of Interest
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

Addressing the real parties in interest (RPI) requirement for inter partes review (IPR) petitions, a panel for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board


No Second Life for Fetal Test
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

By a poll of active justices, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a petition for an en banc rehearing of Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc


It Ends Not with a Bang but a Whimper
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

The patent case between Commil and Cisco, a case that made new law at the Supreme Court on the issue of the intent requirement in cases of induced


There Is More than One Way to Slice the Apportionment Analysis
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

Addressing the application of the smallest salable patent-practicing unit analysis, as well as the impact of a patent’s standards essential status on


Petitioners: Put All Needed Evidence in Your Petition
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

Addressing the rules governing admissibility of supplemental information during an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding, the U.S. Court of Appeals


Discretion to Dismiss IPR Petition Pre-Institution
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

Addressing whether a petitioner seeking inter partes review (IPR) is entitled to withdraw its petition prior to an institution decision, the Patent


What Happens on Remand of a PTAB Inter Partes Review Decision from the Federal Circuit?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

In Microsoft Corp., v. Proxyconn, Inc. (IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 7), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recognized that there are


Post-Grant PTAB Procedures Are Constitutional
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

In a case of first impression, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the constitutionality of inter partes review (IPR


De Novo Review Used In Remand in Claim Construction
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2016

Addressing issues of claim construction after a remand from the Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit again reversed the