We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 1,395

Empowering customers to sell an exonerated accused product
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

In a decision that expands a customer’s right to defend itself under the Kessler doctrine, the Federal Circuit clarified that a customer is not


In seeking patent review, timing matters
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Clarifying the “final written decision” rule in Covered Business Method (CBM) reviews, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit explained


A kinder, gentler PTAB allows claim amendments
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

In a final written decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) agreed with the petitioner that the original challenged claims were


Price optimization in e-commerce not patent eligible
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice addressing patent-eligible subject matter (IP Update, Vol. 17, No. 7), the U.S. Court of Appeals


No deference by the Federal Circuit to lower courts’ claim construction findings
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Addressing issues of claim construction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently reversed the decisions of two district courts


Keep the petitions concise
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Addressing the issues of voluminous petitions and obviousness, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or


Poor litigation conduct by prevailing party not enough to obviate exceptional-case doctrine
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Addressing the degree to which litigation conduct can preclude the recovery of fees under 35 U.S. C. 285, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal


Fetal DNA test cannot give birth to a patent
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Addressing the issue of patent eligibility of a pre-natal testing invention, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit unanimously affirmed


PTAB institutes very first post-grant review (PGR)
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Representing the first decision of its kind, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) instituted the first post-grant review (PGR) under the


Federal Circuit throws out a willful infringement verdict due to lack of standing
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

Addressing the issue of standing, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a jury verdict of willful infringement, finding that