We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 1,330

Claim construction OK; but still no summary judgment where material facts remain in dispute
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

Addressing an appeal by a patent owner of a summary judgment of invalidity, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district


Need to establish criticality of claimed range to avoid anticipation by broader, overlapping range
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

Addressing anticipation under pre-AIA 102 in the context of a claimed numerical range and prior art disclosing a broader, overlapping range, the U


PTO refusal to terminate ongoing proceeding is not immediately reviewable
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

Addressing the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO’s) refusal to terminate four inter partes reexaminations after a corresponding district court


Applicability of the entire market value rule in Hatch-Waxman cases
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

Addressing damages issues in the Hatch-Waxman context, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit provided important guidance regarding the


Technological invention exception key to foiling CBM
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

In four orders addressing the requirements for instituting a Covered Business Method (CBM) review, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial


ID on infringement and public interest in remand of interdigital investigation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 28 2015

In a long-running investigation brought by InterDigital concerning Nokia mobile phones, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) on the remand hearing from


New amendments to USPTO post-grant regulations
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

On May 19, 2015, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a final rule amending its regulations that apply to post-grant


Notice of an order intending final judgment, even if erroneous, triggers appeal
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

Addressing the requirements for extending and reopening the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. Pro. 4(a), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal


Non-claimed elements cannot transform an abstract idea
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

Addressing unpatentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) concluded that additional elements not


Specific application will not avoid ineligibility unless required by the claims
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

Addressing the patent eligibility of claims from two challenged covered business method patents (CBMs), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent