We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 1,827

Intellectual Ventures Loses Claims Based on 101, Collateral Estoppel, Standing
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 27 2017

In a pair of decisions handed down on the same day by Chief Judge Prost, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit struck down a raft of claims


No Equitable Defense of Laches in Patent Law
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 27 2017

In a 7-1 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the equitable defense of laches is no longer a valid defense to patent damages


Heads Up! That’s Patentable Subject Matter
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 27 2017

In addressing the first step of the Supreme Court of the United States’ 101 framework in Alice (IP Update, Vol. 17, No. 7) evaluating whether the


Throwing Out One Baby, but Not Two, with the Bathwater
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 27 2017

Addressing the impact of patent prosecution arguments on claim construction, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated the district


ITC Sanctions for “Staggering” Destruction of Evidence Upheld
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 27 2017

Addressing the imposition of sanctions for spoliation in a US International Trade Commission (ITC) case, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal


Obviousness Does Not Speak for Itself
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 27 2017

Addressing the issue of evidence required for a sustainable obviousness determination, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a


Petitions Seeking CBM Review Continue Uphill Battle After Unwired Planet
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 27 2017

In a series of cases addressing the standard for initiating a covered business method (CBM) review, both the US Court of Appeals for the Federal


Federal Circuit Evaluates PTAB Reliance on Expert Testimony to Satisfy Substantial Evidence
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 27 2017

Addressing for the first time the extent to which the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) may rely on expert testimony to satisfy the substantial


Factual Findings Required to Show “Apparent Reason to Combine”
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 27 2017

Addressing issues of obviousness and anticipation in the context of an inter partes review, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued


Incorporation by Reference Used to Arrive at BRI Claim Construction
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 27 2017

Resolving what was primarily a broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) claim construction issue, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit