We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 1,799

General “Desire” to Improve Can Provide Sufficient Rationale to Combine References
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 27 2017

Pointing to the "normal desire" of scientists to improve what is already known as a rationale to combine, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal


Not Intuitively Obvious: Federal Circuit Remands for Explicit Rational to Combine
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 27 2017

In a rebuke of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB's) obviousness analysis, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and


Multiple Actors May Perform Steps in Method Claims for Purposes of Inducement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 27 2017

Addressing the issue of divided infringement, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's finding of induced


Electronic Trading Claims Are Patent Eligible
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 27 2017

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's holding that claims directed to electronic trading are patent eligible


On Appeal, Infringement Ruling Gets the Jitters
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 31 2017

Addressing multiple issues in the long-running litigation between competing power supply controller chip companies, the US Court of Appeals for the


Final Written Decision Demonstrates Breadth of PGR Review
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 31 2017

In a Final Written Decision (FWD) in a post-grant review (PGR), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) addressed post-grant review eligibility


Default Judgment Affirmed for Unreasonable, Dilatory Discovery Conduct
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 31 2017

Addressing default judgment and injunction issues, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of a default


“Inventive Concept” Requires Specific Use of Computer Components Beyond Their Generic Use
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 31 2017

Addressing the "inventive concept" prong of a Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted the


Factual Dispute Defeats Summary Judgment on Inherent Anticipation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 31 2017

Addressing inherent anticipation and inequitable conduct issues, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a summary judgment of


En Banc Federal Circuit to Consider AIA Appeals Based on Time Bar Provision
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 31 2017

In a September 2015 panel decision, Achates Reference Publishing v. Apple, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that under 35 USC