We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 434

Patent reissue breadth anchored to previous Markman construction
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • May 13 2015

Yesterday, in ArcelorMittal France v. AK Steel Corp.(CAFC 2015), the CAFC considered the impact of a reissue of U.S. Patent 6,296,805 on a previous


Trends changes & evolving PTAB practice
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • April 28 2015

Over the last month patent owners have continued to fare much better than they did during the first two years of AIA proceedings. Patent owners


PTAB expanded panels are not by party request
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • May 11 2015

As the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) is now issuing an increasing number of Final Written Decisions (FWD) in addition to Institution Decisions


Senate Patent Act on fast track?
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

Senate Bill Jumps to Forefront of Patent Reform Debate Introduced just last week, the Patent Act of 2015 (S.1137) will be considered by the full


PTAB considers "could have been raised" estoppel
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • April 30 2015

Today, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) added the recent Decision on Institution rendered in Dell, Inc. v. Electronics and Telecomms. Res


Republicans eye further patent reform for 2015
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • December 3 2014

With the incoming Republican majority itching to make their mark, patent reform appears at the top of the legislative agenda for 2015. As discussed


Why hedge fund PTAB filings will fail
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • April 10 2015

I first discussed the potential abuse of PTAB post-grant Patent Trial proceedings back in 2013. Since that time, attempts by profiteers to leverage


PTAB & alternative dispute resolution
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • April 23 2015

The Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) has the power to terminate an Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post Grant Review (PGR), or a Covered Business Method


CAFC ruling calls into question PTAB settlement authority
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • April 2 2015

Yesterday, in Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (here), the CAFC considered whether or not the interlocutory jurisdiction of


Patent Act of 2015 offers bipartisan compromise on reform
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • April 29 2015

Today, key drafters of the America Invents Act introduced their own bipartisan patent reform bill in the Senate. (Senators, Grassley (R - Iowa