We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 495

District court allows discovery to re-open to permit plaintiff to compel defendant to produce update sales records prior to trial
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • September 2 2015

Isola USA Corp. ("Isola") moved to compel Taiwan Union Technology Corp. ("TUC") to provide updated sales data in response to document requests an


District court denies motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction where plaintiff sent ANDA Notice Letter
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 31 2015

Defendants, Nang Kuang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. ("Nang Kuang") and CANDA NX-2, LLC ("CANDA") (collectively, "Defendants") filed a motion to dismiss


District court grants summary judgment of no damages for failure to mark
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 26 2015

Plaintiff Juno Manufacturing, LLC ("Plaintiff" or "Juno") filed a patent infringement complaint against Defendant Nora Lighting, Inc. ("Defendant" or


District court denies motion to exclude CEO from providing expert testimony on infringement
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 24 2015

Defendant filed a motion to strike plaintiff's expert report on infringement, asserting that the report failed to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 because


Enovsys v. AT&T: court excludes plaintiff's damage expert for failure to apportion and sua sponte bifurcates trial into liability and damage phases to be tried to different juries
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 19 2015

After the court struck plaintiff's damage expert's report for failing to tie damages to the limited feature of the patented invention, the court


Motion for judgment on the pleadings based on unpatentability under Section 101 denied where patents were not directed to an abstract idea
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 17 2015

Defendants Motorola Mobility, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., HTC Corp., HTC America, Inc


In-house counsel ordered to sit for additional deposition after emails improperly withheld on basis of privilege
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 13 2015

Sprint Communications Company, L.P., filed a patent-infringement action against Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast IP Phone, LLC, and Comcast


District court denies stay based on inter partes review ("IPR") where less than 25 of claims at issue were subject to IPR
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 11 2015

Defendants HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership, Sprint Spectrum L.P., Kyocera Corporation, Boost Mobile


Smartflash v. Apple: district court stays case sua sponte based on pending covered business method ("CBM") patent review
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 5 2015

The court had previously stayed a cased pending between Smartflash LLC and Amazon and simultaneously declined to stay an earlier-filed case between


District court denies motion to stay pending inter partes review as "toss up"
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • August 3 2015

The Boeing Company ("Boeing") filed a motion to stay pending inter partes review" ("IPR") after Boeing had requested that the United States Patent