We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 469

District court orders submission of expert reports on damages to determine proper usage of entire market value rule
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 18 2015

Invista North America S.A. R.L. ("Invistia") filed a patent infringement action against M&G USA Corporation ("M&G"). As the case progressed toward


Motion for judgment on the pleadings based on Section 101 denied where defendant failed to include challenge in invalidity contentions
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 13 2015

In this patent infringement action between Plaintiffs Good Technology Corporation and Good Technology Software, Inc. ("Good) and Defendant MobileIron


District court denies motion to compel and for sanctions where CFO could not be compelled to testify on broad deposition topics including royalties, affirmative defenses, infringement contentions and invalidity contentions
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 11 2015

Plaintiff Stoneeagle Services, Inc. ("Stoneeagle") filed a motion seeking sanctions against Defendant Premier Healthcare Exchange, Inc. ("PHX") for


Another one bites the dust: action dismissed for lack of standing where plaintiff could not prove ownership of the patent-in-suit
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2015

America's Collectibles Network ("ACN") filed a patent infringement action in which it claimed to own U.S. Patent No. 8,370,211 (the "211 Patent"). It


Fairchild v. Power Integrations: because of right to appeal, district court precludes reference to pending reexamination proceedings even though PTO had rejected all claims
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. and Fairchild (Taiwan) Corp.'s (collectively, "Fairchild") moved in limine to preclude any reference to any pending


District court denies motion to stay pending inter partes review where trial was less than a year away and defendant's previous attempts at re-examination were unsuccessful
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • April 29 2015

Presidio Components, Inc. ("Presidio") filed a complaint against American Technical Ceramics Corp. ("ATC") asserting a claim for patent infringement


District court excludes prior art references in expert report that were not included in invalidity contentions
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • April 27 2015

After the district court adopted a specialized scheduling order that was based on local patent rules in other districts, the plaintiffs served


District court denies motion to exclude expert testimony on the ground that the expert was not a person having ordinary skill in the art
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • April 22 2015

Defendants sought to exclude the testimony of Plaintiff's expert Joseph C. McAlexander III in its entirety because he lacked the appropriate


Aylus v. Apple: district court orders production of revenue documents
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • April 20 2015

Aylus Networks, Inc. ("Aylus") sought documents from Apple "relating to the revenue, costs and profits from (1) purchases or rentals of iTunes video


District court declines to lift stay even after Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued written decision on CBM petitions
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • April 15 2015

The district court stayed several consolidated cases pending certain proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB"). In the order