We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 627

District Court Precludes New Substitute Witness for Failure to Timely Disclose
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • March 2 2017

As trial approached in this patent infringement action, the plaintiff, 511 Innovations, Inc., filed a motion to exclude a witness at trial, Tim Benner


District Court Denies Request to Change Expert Date Based on Change in Defense Counsel
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 21 2017

Plaintiff Genes Industry, Inc. ("Genes") filed a patent infringement action against Defendant Custom Blinds and Components, Inc. ("Custom"). The


District Court Stays Case Pending Inter Partes Review After Non-Petitioning Defendant Agrees to be Bound by Estoppel Provisions
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 14 2017

In a previous order, the district court granted a motion to stay pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR") but deferred ruling on the Motion to Stay with


District Court Excludes Damage Expert for Failure to Apportion But Gives Expert One More Opportunity to Supplement Report
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 7 2017

In this patent infringement action, Plaid sought to exclude the entirety of the plaintiff's damage expert's, Robinson's, reasonable royalty analysis


District Court Denies Motion to Compel Inadvertently Produced Privileged Documents
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 31 2017

In this patent infringement action, Teva inadvertently produced documents to Sunovion. Teva subsequently attempted to claw back the documents under


District Court Orders Production of Attorney-Client Communications Between Opinion Counsel and Trial Counsel Based on Advice of Counsel Defense
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 17 2017

Plaintiff Krausz Industries Ltd. ("Krausz") filed a motion for an order compelling Defendants Smith-Blair, Inc. and Sensus USA, Inc. (collectively


District Court Denies Motion to Withdraw Deemed Admissions
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 10 2017

The plaintiff filed an ex parte application to be relieved of admissions that were deemed admitted for failure to respond. In analyzing the ex parte


District Court Denies Motion to Stay Pending Ex Parte Reexamination Where Defendant Did Not Pursue Inter Partes Review
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • January 3 2017

After filing an ex parte reexamination with the Patent Office, the defendant filed a motion to stay the action pending the ex parte reexamination. In


Personal Web v. IBM: IBM's Motion to Compel Documents from Privilege Log Denied Where Motion Was Filed After Discovery Cut-Off
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 29 2016

In this patent infringement action, IBM filed a motion to compel production of certain documents that were withheld as privileged. IBM contend that


Plaintiff Cannot Take Back Venue Admission in Patent Infringement Action
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • December 27 2016

Plaintiff Ecojet, Inc. ("Ecojet") brought a patent infringement action against Defendant Luraco, Inc. ("Luraco") for infringement of U.S. Patent No