We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 7,063

Can employers refuse to cover spouses?
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

The Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) requires employers to cover dependents (meaning children) until they turn 26 years old, or pay a penalty. 42 U.S.C.A

What does the Affordable Care Act have to do with independent contractors?
  • Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
  • USA
  • August 12 2014

When we think of the Affordable Care Act ("ACA"), we invariably think of health insurance. The ACA mandates that any employer with 50 or more full

Update 7: ACA Market Stabilization Rules Finalized; Cost-Sharing Next Hurdle
  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • USA
  • April 20 2017

The Trump Administration has issued final market stabilization rules designed to keep insurers in the individual health insurance Marketplaces. The

Recent federal rulings on COBRA notification requirements
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • USA
  • April 23 2015

There have been several recently-decided cases concerning employer's responsibilities for continued health care coverage requirements under the

April 18, 2017 is the Deadline to Make Contributions to a Health Savings Account for 2016
  • Dickinson Wright PLLC
  • USA
  • April 7 2017

If you were eligible in 2016 to make contributions to a Health Savings Account (H.S.A.) and you have not already made the maximum contribution for the

IRS Will Not Require Response to Qualifying Health Coverage Line on 2016 Form 1040 Filings
  • Dickinson Wright PLLC
  • USA
  • March 27 2017

Individuals completing their 2016 IRS Form 1040s will recognize the question asking if they, their spouses and dependents had qualifying health care

Affordable Care Act prohibits extra health insurance benefits for executives
  • Wilson Elser
  • USA
  • August 22 2013

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) generally prohibits an employer from providing its highly compensated employees with health insurance that is more

Illinois Supreme Court Issue Long-Awaited Decision on Vesting of Retiree Health Care Benefits in Matthews v. Chicago Transit Authority
  • Franczek Radelet PC
  • USA
  • May 16 2016

On May 5th, nearly a full year after it heard oral arguments in the case, the Illinois Supreme Court issued its decision in Matthews v. Chicago

Guide to going global employment 2016
  • DLA Piper LLP
  • Australia, Ireland, United Kingdom, USA
  • June 30 2016

Many companies today aim to scale their businesses globally and into multiple countries simultaneously. In order to help clients meet this challenge

Common control or overlapping ownership can change how to identify the "employer" for PPACA purposes
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2012

This is the third in a series of Executive Alerts in the Special Health Care Reform Series