We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 65

Supreme Court allows favorable employer stock ruling to stand
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • November 2 2012

The US Supreme Court recently declined to review the “stock drop” cases decided late last year by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit involving Citigroup and McGraw-Hill


MetLife v. Glenn: Supreme Court cautions on conflicted fiduciaries deciding claims
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2008

On June 19, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Glenn (“Glenn”


Sixth Circuit affirms decision to enforce arbitration provision in retiree benefit dispute
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • August 2 2013

The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently affirmed a district court's decision to grant defendant-appellee TRW Vehicle Safety Systems


Court finds private equity portfolio company may have liability for withdrawal by another portfolio company
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • August 16 2013

The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently delivered a potentially far-reaching decision for the private equity industry. In a case which


IRS will recognize all marriages of same-sex couples if valid where performed
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • August 30 2013

On June 26, the US Supreme Court required the federal government to recognize marriages between two individuals of the same sex if the marriage is


US Supreme Court’s impending decision on DOMA may impact most employee benefit plans
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • April 5 2013

Late last month the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases concerning same-sex marriage. The Court's decisions are expected by the end of


Parent corporate defendants exposed to liability in ERISA suit under veil-piercing theory
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • July 9 2010

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware denied defendants’ motion to dismiss an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) complaint, ruling among other things that plaintiffs properly alleged facts to reach the corporate parent defendants on a theory of piercing the corporate veil


Executive’s responsibility for SEC filings may be grounds for rule 10b-5 liability
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • February 22 2008

A federal district court denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action seeking civil penalties for claims that the defendant, the former President and COO of a public company, violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the Company’s failure to disclose, among other things, the company’s practice of backdating stock options in its 2002 Form 10-K


Investment adviser convicted of defrauding employee benefit plan
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • April 30 2010

On April 16, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, together with the Regional Director for the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Special Agent in Charge, announced the conviction of Anthony James for 14 criminal counts relating to his operation of a Ponzi scheme


Second Circuit to consider employer’s discretion in connection with LTIP
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • October 29 2010

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering the district court’s decision in Fishoff v. Coty Inc., which held that the Coty Board’s broad discretion under its Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan (LTIP) did not include attributing two different fair market values to its stock for the same day