We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,776

N.C. Court of Appeals denies bid to return watersewer "impact fees"
  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • USA
  • August 4 2015

Impact fees are defined, generally, as a charge on new development to pay for the construction or expansion of off-site capital improvements that are


U.S. District Court Denies Penobscot Nation's Claim to Penobscot River
  • Pierce Atwood LLP
  • USA
  • December 16 2015

On December 16, 2015, Judge Singal issued his decision in the Penobscot Indian Nation v. Mills lawsuit, in which the Penobscot Indian Nation (PIN


Johnson County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals v. KC Propco, LLC, 28 N.E.3d 370 (Ind. Tax 2015)
  • Barrett & McNagny
  • USA
  • June 9 2015

With the increasing number of families in which both spouses are employed full-time, together with the emphasis on early childhood education, more


More ADA Cases Filed by Serial Plaintiff David Ritzenthaler
  • Jennings Strouss & Salmon PLC
  • USA
  • April 7 2016

If Phoenix-area business owners don’t already know who David Ritzenthaler is, they soon will. The Scottsdale resident has sued more than 200 local


The newest sign for some sign ordinances: stop
  • McBrayer McGinnis Leslie & Kirkland PLLC
  • USA
  • July 9 2015

Sign ordinances and regulations are a fixture of city and county zoning and land use regulations, designed to prevent unattractive clutter from


Proposed state constitutional amendment regarding eminent domain powers supported by house, readies for Senate vote
  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2015

We blogged in the past here about House Bill 3 pending in the North Carolina General Assembly, which is entitled: "AN ACT TO AMEND THE North Carolina


Court permits political candidate to solicit nominating signatures on retailer’s private property
  • Beveridge & Diamond PC
  • USA
  • November 7 2014

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that a supermarket violated a political candidate's state constitutional rights when the store


'It takes hutzpah!': D.C. federal judge issues stunning rebuke of HUD disparate impact rule
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • November 5 2014

On November 3, 2014, Judge Richard J. Leon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, issued a scathing opinion striking down a


New Jersey Supreme Court decision expands redevelopment opportunities
  • Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP
  • USA
  • April 8 2015

In 2009, our partners Robert S. Goldsmith and Robert Beckelman wrote an article for the Rutgers Law Record entitled "What Will Happen to


Illinois Supreme Court rules local land use codes apply to school districts
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • September 25 2015

The Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that school districts are subject to municipal zoning and land use regulations when constructing new facilities