We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 924

California district court finds CAFA’s amount-in-controversy requirement satisfied and no local controversy alleged; denies motion to remand
  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

The Southern District of California denied a plaintiff's motion to remand a putative class action removed pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act

New York Federal Court finds CGL insurer must defend third-party product recall claims
  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • USA
  • August 18 2015

A federal court in New York recently found that litigation concerning damages related to a third party's product recall required a defense under a

Class action round-up - spring 2015
  • Alston & Bird LLP
  • USA
  • June 9 2015

On April 27, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robinssetting the stage for an important decision on whether a

California’s highest court refuses to review denial of coverage under contamination products insurance policy for ground beef recall
  • Wilson Elser
  • USA
  • May 29 2015

On May 20, 2015, the California Supreme Court denied Windsor Food Quality Company, Ltd.’s (Windsor’s) petition for review of the decision of the

Insurance coverage for food contamination costs
  • Brouse McDowell
  • USA
  • May 27 2015

Despite government regulation, numerous safety precautions, and a public more knowledgeable about the spread of bacteria, food contamination and its

Georgia Court of Appeals holds pollution exclusion does not apply to lead-based paint
  • Rogers Townsend & Thomas PC
  • USA
  • May 12 2015

In a March 31, 2015 opinion, the Georgia Court of Appeals held that an absolute pollution exclusion provision in a CGL policy did not exclude

Technology companies: when a product complaint arises, will your insurance cover the claims?
  • Nossaman LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2015

Sometimes, technology products contain flaws. Purchasers may complain to the manufacturer about the flawed products, and some complaints become

National Union Fire ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, P.A. v. Tokio Marine and Nichido Fire Ins. Co.
  • Carroll, Burdick & McDonough LLP
  • USA
  • April 2 2015

In National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, P.A. V. Tokio Marine and Nichido Fire Ins. Co., __ Cal. Rptr. 3d __, 2015 WL 459231 (Feb. 4, 2015

Contamination products insurance does not cover recall of ingredients supplied to insured manufacturer
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • March 25 2015

In Windsor Food Quality Company, Ltd v. The Underwriters of Lloyds of London, et al. (2015) 2015 Cal.App. LEXIS 195, the California Court of Appeal

California court holds product contamination insurance does not cover ingredients contaminated by insured’s supplier
  • Cozen O'Connor
  • USA
  • March 18 2015

On February 6th, an intermediate level California appellate court held that a product contamination policy only covered contamination that occurs