We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 842

Georgia Court of Appeals holds pollution exclusion does not apply to lead-based paint
  • Rogers Townsend & Thomas PC
  • USA
  • May 12 2015

In a March 31, 2015 opinion, the Georgia Court of Appeals held that an absolute pollution exclusion provision in a CGL policy did not exclude


Technology companies: when a product complaint arises, will your insurance cover the claims?
  • Nossaman LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2015

Sometimes, technology products contain flaws. Purchasers may complain to the manufacturer about the flawed products, and some complaints become


National Union Fire ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, P.A. v. Tokio Marine and Nichido Fire Ins. Co.
  • Carroll, Burdick & McDonough LLP
  • USA
  • April 2 2015

In National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, P.A. V. Tokio Marine and Nichido Fire Ins. Co., __ Cal. Rptr. 3d __, 2015 WL 459231 (Feb. 4, 2015


Contamination products insurance does not cover recall of ingredients supplied to insured manufacturer
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • March 25 2015

In Windsor Food Quality Company, Ltd v. The Underwriters of Lloyds of London, et al. (2015) 2015 Cal.App. LEXIS 195, the California Court of Appeal


California court holds product contamination insurance does not cover ingredients contaminated by insured’s supplier
  • Cozen O'Connor
  • USA
  • March 18 2015

On February 6th, an intermediate level California appellate court held that a product contamination policy only covered contamination that occurs


Contamination products insurance does not cover recall of ingredients supplied to insured manufacturer
  • Gordon & Rees LLP
  • USA
  • March 11 2015

The California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District held that a contamination products policy does not cover ingredients obtained from a


Insurance coverage considerations for alleged mislabeling of herbal and dietary supplements
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • February 13 2015

The New York Attorney General recently ordered four major retailers to stop selling herbal supplements that it alleged did not contain labeled


California appellate court finds no malicious product tampering coverage for Westland’s ground beef
  • Wilson Elser
  • USA
  • February 11 2015

In 2008, Windsor Food Quality Company, Ltd. (Windsor) purchased WestlandHallmark Meat Company's (Westland's) ground beef as an ingredient to be used


Insurer sues to avoid coverage for Templeton whiskey’s alleged mislabeling
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 9 2015

Society Insurance has filed a lawsuit in Iowa federal court seeking a declaration that its policy does not require it to defend or indemnify Templeton


Another listeria outbreak reminds food industry to revisit insurance program
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • December 22 2014

On December 19, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended that U.S. consumers not eat any commercially produced