We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 32

Advertising Law Snapshot Volume 1, Issue 19
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • November 17 2016

Do not mislead as to source of native ads. Where consumers would not recognize content as an ad, ensure that such content is clearly and conspicuously


Advertising Law Snapshots Volume 1, Issue 18
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 26 2016

“Made in USA” or “Proudly Made in USA” are claims made for glue products, such as Kwik Fix, Hammer Tite, and Krylex. Approximately 55 of the costs of


Advertising Law Snapshots Volume 1, Issue 17
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 20 2016

Court Hold’s “Stock Elements” of Beyoncé’s Lemonade Video Don’t Infringe Short Film


Advertising Law Snapshots Volume 1, Issue 16
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 6 2016

CocoaVia daily cocoa extract supplement delivers the highest concentration of cocoa flavanols”. The superiority claim applies to all competitive


Advertising Law Snapshots Volume 1, Issue 15
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • September 22 2016

“Cheerios Protein” name is misleading because it says nothing about added sugar (and the product has more sugar than regular Cheerios


Advertising Law Snapshots, Volume 1, Issue 13
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • July 28 2016

Watch manufacturer advertised its products as "handmade in Detroit" FTC Determination: Since the company sourced significant


Advertising Law Snapshots, Volume 1, Issue 12
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 8 2016

Tyson launched "Park's Finest" hot dogs Parks LLC sells sausages and other meat products Parks claims that Tyson infringed upon its "Parks"


User Successfully Shows He Is a Subscriber for VPPA, Case Continues
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 25 2016

In a closely watched case, the publisher of the USA Today mobile app (Gannett) is alleged to have violated the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA


Advertising Law Snapshots, Volume 1, Issue 11
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 24 2016

The iTunes terms of service state in part: In no case shall Apple, its directors, officers, employees, affiliates, agents, contractors, or licensors


Advertising Law Snapshots, Volume 1, Issue 10
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 11 2016

Dish advertised that consumers could watch "commercial free televisior' via its "Hopper" Allegation: Claim was false and deceptive because the