We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 22,216

ITC reverses finding of violation of Section 337 and terminates investigation in Certain Electronic Imaging Devices (337-TA-850)
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • March 19 2014

On March 14, 2014, the International Trade Commission (the "Commission") issued a notice in Certain Electronic Imaging Devices (Inv. No. 337-TA-850


ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-918) regarding Certain Toner Cartridges
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • June 11 2014

On June 6, 2014, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued a press release announcing their vote to institute an investigation of Certain Toner


ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-917) regarding Certain Silicon Tuners
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • June 11 2014

On June 6, 2014, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued apress release announcing their vote to institute an investigation ofCertain Silicon


Toshiba & Samsung argue - technology evolvespatent claims don't
  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • USA
  • March 20 2014

Judge Steve C. Jones entered a Markman Order (full order here) in the dispute between Synchrome Technology Inc. ("Synchrome"), as plaintiff, and


Federal Circuit holds computer-implemented method claims invalid under Section 101
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • February 4 2014

Although SmartGene, Inc. v. Advanced Biological Laboratories, SA is a non-precedential Federal Circuit decision, it could be interesting for that


LSI’s reply comments in ITC’s review of RAND ruling in LSI-Realtek investigation (inv. No. 337-TA-837)
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • January 7 2014

We previously discussed the opening comments filed by Complainant LSI in the International Trade Commission (ITC) investigation of whether Realtek


SDNY holds anti-piracy patent nonobvious: Medien Patent Verwaltung AG v. Warner Bros. Ent. Inc.
  • Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
  • USA
  • January 29 2014

District Judge Colleen McMahon construed a claim term in U.S. Patent 7,187,633, ("the '633 patent"), relating anti-piracy coding in motion pictures


US courts and the European Commission further limit “no challenge” clauses in license agreements
  • Baker McKenzie
  • European Union, USA
  • January 28 2014

On January 14, 2013, the US Supreme Court denied a certiorari petition by Rates Technology and let stand the decision of the US Court of Appeals for


U.S. government and USPTO urges Federal Circuit to dismiss stem cell appeal
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • February 3 2014

On January 17, 2014, the United States government and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (collectively "the government") responded to the


ALJ Essex rules on motions in Certain Wireless Devices with 3G andor 4G Capabilities (337-TA-868)
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • January 30 2014

On January 22, 2014, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued the public versions of Order Nos. 88 and 89 (dated January 10, 2014 and January 15, 2014