We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 19,557

Patent is invalid under Alice
  • Morris James LLP
  • USA
  • January 12 2016

Robinson, J. Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. The patent-in-suit is directed to redeeming discount offers by associating a


Federal Circuit’s claim construction cases business as usual after Teva
  • Arnstein & Lehr LLP
  • USA
  • May 21 2015

Claim construction is central to virtually every patent case. The patent claims define the limits of the invention. Often, the meaning of terms in a


New test, same results: indefiniteness after Biosig v. Nautilus
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • June 3 2015

Under the Patent Act, a patent specification must "conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject


Get ready for Fed. Circ. guidance on AIA trials
  • Kaye Scholer LLP
  • USA
  • June 2 2015

Starting in late 2012, the first petitions were filed for the new adversarial America Invents Act proceedings before the newly formed Patent Trial


US and Ontario court jointly distribute $7.3 billion in liquidated assets of insolvent technology business: Nortel Networks Corporation (Re), 2015 ONSC 2987 (ONSC commercial list)
  • SIM. IP Practice
  • Canada, USA
  • June 4 2015

Nortel Networks Corporation was a telecommunications firm that filed for protection under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA") in 2009


No collateral challenge of patent application revival
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • March 31 2015

In Exela Pharma Sciences, LLC v. Lee, the Federal Circuit held that the USPTO's decision to revive a patent application &8220;is not subject to


Amgen v. Sandoz: the oral argument
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • June 4 2015

Yesterday, before a packed courtroom, Judges Newman, Lourie, and Chen of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in


Magistrate recommends judgment in favor of defendants based on collateral estoppel
  • Morris James LLP
  • USA
  • June 2 2015

Burke, M. J. Report and recommendation regarding summary judgment that the defendants’ noninfringement motion be granted in part and denied as moot


The Fox Group, Inc. v. Cree, Inc., No. 2011-1576 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 28, 2012)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • December 8 2012

Under Section 102(g), in order to invalidate a patent claim on the ground of prior inventorship, an alleged infringer must prove either that it conceived of the invention first and was diligent in reducing it to practice or that it reduced its invention to practice before the critical date of the patent-at-issue


Open question: use of IPR and CBM institution decisions in district court
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • June 3 2015

As the number of inter partes review (IPR) and covered business method (CBM) petition filings continues to increase, an unresolved but significant