We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 21,074

Western District of Washington sets FRAND royalty rates and range for SEPs
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 2 2013

Last week in Microsoft v. Motorola, the U.S. District Court Western District of Washington became the first U.S. court to set fair, reasonable, and


Myriad: unlocking the deep secrets of DNA and patentability
  • Calfee Halter & Griswold LLP
  • USA
  • May 3 2013

My recent tour of the pioneering Global Center for Health Innovation in Cleveland, Ohio reminded me how important DNA is to the future of medicine


Some thoughts on Myriad after the Supreme Court argument
  • Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson
  • USA
  • May 1 2013

On April 15, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics. This was another significant


With the PTO’s cancellation of claims on reexam, a prior validity ruling goes poof
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • July 31 2013

In July, the Federal Circuit held that under the reexamination statute (35 U.S.C. 307(b)), the PTO’s cancellation of claims terminated a pending


ALJ Bullock denies motion for reconsideration and application for interlocutory review in Certain Wiper Blades (337-TA-816)
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • August 19 2013

On August 14, 2013, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued the public version of Order No. 75 (dated August 5, 2013) denying Respondents' motion for


ALJ Shaw denies motion to strike supplemental discovery responses and motion for summary determination of non-infringement in Certain Wireless Devices With 3G Capabilities (337-TA-800)
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • May 3 2013

On April 12, 2013, ALJ David P. Shaw issued the public versions of Order No. 101 and Order No. 102 (both dated February 4, 2013) in Certain Wireless


Genetic technologies settles infringement suit over non-DNA coding technology
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 2 2013

Genetic Technologies Ltd. (GTG) has reportedly settled a patent infringement lawsuit filed in late 2012 against PreventionGenetics. While the terms


Aria Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.
  • Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
  • USA
  • August 9 2013

Case: Aria Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., No. 2012-1531 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2013) (precedential). On appeal from N.D. Cal. Before Rader, Dyk


No prior conception where contemporaneous disclosures failed to show knowledge of complete and operative method of making invention
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 30 2013

Addressing the issue of conception in an interference proceeding, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the U.S


Obviousness-type double patenting may exist when there is neither common ownership nor common inventorship
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 30 2013

Addressing an obviousness-type double patenting rejection, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a decision by the U.S. Patent and