We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 19,310

Infringement found for shipping components overseas
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • January 26 2015

In PROMEGA Corp. V. LIFE Technologies Corp., Appeal Nos. 2013-1011, -1029, and -1376, the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's grant of the


Inter partes review requested for MiMedx tissue graft patent
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • January 22 2015

Tissue Transplant Technology Ltd. and Human Biologics of Texas Ltd. ("the Petitioners") recently filed a petition with the Patent Trial and Appeal


ALJ Bullock sanctions Macronix respondents in Certain Flash Memory (337-TA-893)
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • January 26 2015

On January 21, 2015, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued the public version of Order No. 76 (dated January 13, 2015) in Certain Flash Memory Chips


U.S.I.T.C. may not issue exclusionary order due to induced infringement when direct infringement occurs only after importation
  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • USA
  • October 24 2014

In a panel decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a United States International Trade Commission (ITC) ruling, holding that


The Medicines Company’s ’727 patent found to be infringed, valid, and enforceable by U.S. District Court
  • Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP
  • USA
  • October 27 2014

On October 27, 2014, District Court Judge Amy J. St. Eve of the Northern District of Illinois found in an 80 page opinion that Mylan's proposed


In SEP assertion cases, apportionment trumps entire market rule
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2015

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed a spectrum of issues surrounding industry standards for electronic devices that


Draft available only as a password-protected download is not a printed publication
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2015

Addressing a petition to institute an inter partes review of a patent for communicating between different modem types, the U.S. Patent and Trademark


Federal Circuit issues an opinion in 40 year dispute over “Gore-Tex” blood vessel graft patent
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • January 30 2015

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court's finding that W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. ("Gore") willfully


Supreme Court applies “clear error” review to claim construction (Teva v. Sandoz)
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • January 23 2015

Earlier this week, in Teva v. Sandoz, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the "factual underpinnings" of a district court's claim construction decision


Has the machine-or-transformation test returned to prominence in patent cases?
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • January 29 2015

The machine-or-transformation test was once the gatekeeper of patent eligibility, but that reign ended in 2010 when the Supreme Court stated in