We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 20,615

References showing results in one range made investigation into lower ranges obvious; composition claim obvious where patentee’s arguments were based on unclaimed limitation
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • March 24 2015

Federal Circuit affirms bench verdict of invalidity for obviousness. The patent covered an eyedrop composition with a specific range of the drug


Many courts are reluctant to permit parties to redact filed documents, or to file them under seal, even when they contain trade secrets
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • March 25 2015

In a patent infringement case pending in a California federal court, the defendant moved for summary judgment. The parties jointly requested leave to


Last month at the Federal Circuit - October 2014
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

In buySAFE, Inc. v. Google, Inc., No. 13-1575 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 3, 2014), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s determination that the


Supreme Court: new standard of review for patent claim construction
  • Jenner & Block LLP
  • USA
  • March 25 2015

In Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 831 (2015) (No. 13-854), the Supreme Court addressed the standard of review the Court


Timeliness the devil is in the details (a.k.a. Rules)
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

In an order issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board), the Board expunged exhibits from the records of five related cases on the


Overly narrow statement of problem can show reliance on hindsight
  • Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
  • USA
  • May 27 2015

In INSITE VISION INCORPORATED v. Sandoz, Inc., Appeal No. 2014-1065, the Federal Circuit held that enunciating an overly narrow statement of the


Inventor testimony without corroborating evidence is insufficient to prove of reduction to practice
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

Addressing the sufficiency of corroborating evidence to prove earlier reduction to practice, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) found that an


PTAB denies motion to amend for failure to show patentability
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

Addressing a patent owner’s motion to amend by cancelling claims and substituting claims, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and


Solo inventor files two suits over allegedly infringing uninterruptible power supply systems
  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • USA
  • October 30 2014

Walter Farmer, of Atlanta, Georgia, filed separate suits against Alpha Technologies, Inc, ("Alpha"), of Bellingham, Washington, and Aspin Kemp &


“Soda-pop” bottle caps can be analogous art for flash chromatography cartridges
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

Addressing the issue of analogous art in the context of inter partes reexamination, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a