We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 15,592

Patent law and the Supreme Court: certiorari petitions denied - May 2015
  • Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

Whether the Federal Circuit has erred in affirming the District Court’s summary judgment, believing only in the movant’s non-evidentiary and


Federal circuit upholds validity of claims under supreme court’s “reasonable certainty” test for indefiniteness
  • Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
  • USA
  • April 27 2015

The Supreme Court’s “reasonable certainty” standard for indefiniteness is a balance between permitting a modicum of uncertainty in language to ensure


Copyright and patent protection for computer software: how has the landscape changed?
  • Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
  • USA
  • April 29 2015

It has been established for more than two decades that both patent and copyright laws in the United States provide intellectual property protections


BBQ patent must face the heat: petition is not barred when filed within 1 year of the filing of a waiver of service in the district court
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2015

On October 13, 2014, The Brinkman Corporation filed a petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent 8,381,712 directed to a barbecue grill that


Nature-based claims and the patent-eligibility landscape post-‘Mayo’ and ‘Myriad’
  • Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
  • USA
  • April 13 2015

The Supreme Court recently decided two cases in which the central question was whether certain patent claims involving natural materials and


Federal circuit rules on issues of obviousness, provisional rights, and willful infringement
  • Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
  • USA
  • April 29 2015

Substantial evidence supported jury’s determination of nonobviousness, and the jury’s underlying factual findings were not against the weight of the


Patent law and the Supreme Court: certiorari petitions granted - May 2015
  • Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
  • USA
  • May 4 2015

Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit err in using a de novo standard of review instead of a “clear error” standard of


Supreme Court mandates a clear error standard of review for factual findings underlying claim construction
  • Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
  • USA
  • January 20 2015

In a 7-2 decision issued on January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., held that the Federal


It’s a mad, mad, mad, FRAND world
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • January 20 2015

Early Determinations of Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory License Payments Have Been Anything but Consistent When an invention claimed in a


PTAB denies request to use covered business method review for Orange Book-listed patents
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • January 16 2015

The Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) denied the request to review four Orange Book-listed patents owned by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. under the