We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 19,861

ALJ Gildea issues claim construction order in Certain Semiconductor Chips with DRAM Circuitry (337-TA-819)
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • January 7 2013

On December 19, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 17 (dated December 6, 2012) construing the disputed terms of the asserted


ALJ Gildea sets procedural schedule in certain consumer electronics with display and processing capabilities (337-TA-884)
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • July 29 2013

Further to our June 24, 2013 and July 1, 2013 posts, on July 25, 2013, ALJ E. James Gildea issued Order No. 13 in Certain Consumer Electronics With


Post-grant review for covered business method patents: take aways from the first decision
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • August 1 2013

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently issued their first post-grant review of a covered business method patent in SAP Am., Inc. v


NDCA finds violation of FRAND for seeking ITC exclusion order
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • August 1 2013

On May 20, Judge Whyte in the Northern District of California issued his second FRAND-related opinion of the month, this time in Realtek


Objectively reasonable invalidity defense shields accused infringer from willful infringement
  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • USA
  • January 9 2015

In Stryker v. Zimmer, Stryker filed suit alleging infringement of three patents by Zimmer. The patents relate to devices used to remove damaged


Rehearing denied where broadest reasonable construction obviated the need for choice between two distinct constructions
  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • USA
  • January 9 2015

A Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) panel denied a petitioner's request for rehearing of its decision to deny institution of inter partes review


Is “one dollar” sufficient for a patent assignment?
  • Field Law
  • USA
  • January 6 2015

You may have read the recitals or introductory clauses in a license or an assignment agreement. In most cases, these clauses are just skimmed, if


IPR petition may not be deficient where omitted real party in interest is legal successor to disincorporated petitioner
  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • USA
  • January 9 2015

Under 35 U.S.C. 315(a)(2), a party seeking to institute an Inter Partes Review (IPR) must identify all “real parties in interest.” Two weeks ago


Federal Circuit explains the role of actual profits in reasonable royalty calculations and the relationship between preliminary injunctions and willful infringement
  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • USA
  • January 9 2015

On December 22, 2014, the Federal Circuit vacated a district court's decision on damages and willfulness, reasoning that the court (1) placed too


Therasense, Inc.v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.
  • Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
  • USA
  • March 12 2014

Therasense, Inc.v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., No. 2012-1504 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2014) (precedential). On appeal from N.D. Cal. Before Rader, Newman, and