We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 269

LaserDynamics zaps damages
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 16 2013

The district court in Electro-Mechanical strictly interpreted LaserDynamics to toss a jury’s damages verdict


Decisive jury verdict increases ongoing royalty
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2013

The court in Syntrix Biosystems referred to, but did not rely upon, the Read v. Portec factors before deciding a higher ongoing royalty rate was


Lump sum trumps EMVR?
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 16 2013

The HTC Corp. court may have carved out a limited exception to the EMVR. The judge allowed a damages expert to say the hypothetical negotiation would


Higher rate range no concession
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2013

Judge Posner, sitting by designation, concluded a patent was invalid and entered judgment in favor of the accused infringer. However, he did comment


Slammed with double lost profits and fees
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 17 2013

The HubbardDowning court reminds us that a court is not constrained by the patent damages statue when fashioning a sanction for contempt of an order


Federal Circuit refuses to rehear ruling on the finality of patent infringement determinations
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • November 21 2013

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has denied a petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc in 10-year-old litigation that concluded with


Conjoint damages survey passes muster
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • March 15 2013

In TV Interactive Data Corp, the court allows plaintiff to proceed to trial using a conjoint analysis to apportion the value of the patented feature


GAO releases report on patent infringement litigation and its consequences
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 12 2013

The America Invents Act (AIA) mandated that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) conduct a study on the consequences of patent litigation


SCOTUS hears arguments on patentability of human genes
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) heard arguments on Monday specifically addressing whether "human genes are patentable." Ass'n for Molecular Pathology


U.S. Supreme Court considers attorney’s fees in patent litigation
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • February 27 2014

The U.S. supreme Court has heard oral argument in two cases presenting issues relating to the standards that trial and appellate courts apply when