We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 258

Two sides to the lens: U.S. Supreme Court and Federal Circuit take different views?
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 28 2015

Has justice become blinded to fundamental differences between the way patent law is interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit


Resealable cookie packaging patent invalidated as obvious in Kraft- Kellogg dispute
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 7 2015

An Illinois federal court has granted summary judgment in favor of Kellogg North America Co. in a lawsuit disputing the patented design of resealable


Court limits damages to date of reissued patent
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 3 2013

Apple successfully limited the Plaintiff’s damages period to the date of reissue in NetAirus by relying on 35 U.S.C. 252. But, the court also said


Lost profits questions for parentssubsidiaries certified to Federal Circuit
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 3 2013

In Fujitsu Limited, the court followed case law and precluded a foreign parentsole patent holder from recovering lost profits for sales lost by a


Cross-examine rather than reject expert damages testimony
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 3 2013

Applying the notion that rejecting expert testimony is the exception rather than the rule, a magistrate judge in Alexam encouraged vigorous


Judge Posner again strikes damages opinions
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 3 2013

In Promega Corp. Judge Posner reminds us that attention to detail in opinions and resisting the temptation to overreach by damages experts is crucial


Federal court upholds FTC rules on reporting certain pharma patent transfers
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2014

Granting the agency's motion for summary judgment, a federal court in the District of Columbia has upheld the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's (FTC's


SCOTUS reverses Federal Circuit patent ruling
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2014

The U.S. Supreme Court has reversed a Federal Circuit Court of Appeals decision on induced infringement, ruling that a defendant cannot be


Pre-issuance information relevant to royalty damages
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 10 2013

In Philippi, the court concluded that, while pre-issuance sales and marketing data was relevant to royalty damages and was thus discoverable, it was


Higher rate range no concession
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2013

Judge Posner, sitting by designation, concluded a patent was invalid and entered judgment in favor of the accused infringer. However, he did comment