We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,266

Johnson County Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals v. KC Propco, LLC, 28 N.E.3d 370 (Ind. Tax 2015)
  • Barrett & McNagny
  • USA
  • June 9 2015

With the increasing number of families in which both spouses are employed full-time, together with the emphasis on early childhood education, more


N.C. Court of Appeals denies bid to return watersewer "impact fees"
  • Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP
  • USA
  • August 4 2015

Impact fees are defined, generally, as a charge on new development to pay for the construction or expansion of off-site capital improvements that are


Bureau of Indian Affairs proposes regulations in light of Patchak
  • Snell & Wilmer LLP
  • USA
  • May 29 2013

Last year's decisive (8-1) decision by the United States Supreme Court in Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak, 132 S. Ct


U.S. Court rejects challenge to CFIUS national security review
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • China, USA
  • October 23 2013

This blog previously reported in July 2013 on a lawsuit that Ralls Corporation brought against the President of the United States and the Committee


Court of Appeals reaffirms Public Utility District authority to condemn state school trust lands
  • Foster Pepper PLLC
  • USA
  • May 10 2013

In 1930, in the first-ever initiative to the people of the State of Washington, the voters authorized Public Utility Districts. At the same time, the


New Mexico Court of Appeals split opinion rules tribal sovereign immunity does not apply in action to declare road status on tribal fee land
  • Modrall Sperling
  • USA
  • September 3 2013

In a 2-1 opinion, the New Mexico Court of Appeals in Hamaatsa, Inc. v. Pueblo of San Felipe, 2013-NMCA- , No. 31,297 (July 23, 2013), took a very


What you need to know about Ohio’s response to Kelo
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • August 1 2007

In the United States, the power of eminent domain the government’s right to take private property for public use upon reasonable payment to the property’s owner has always operated within strict parameters


The newest sign for some sign ordinances: stop
  • McBrayer McGinnis Leslie & Kirkland PLLC
  • USA
  • July 9 2015

Sign ordinances and regulations are a fixture of city and county zoning and land use regulations, designed to prevent unattractive clutter from


'It takes hutzpah!': D.C. federal judge issues stunning rebuke of HUD disparate impact rule
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • November 5 2014

On November 3, 2014, Judge Richard J. Leon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, issued a scathing opinion striking down a


U.S. District Court Denies Penobscot Nation's Claim to Penobscot River
  • Pierce Atwood LLP
  • USA
  • December 16 2015

On December 16, 2015, Judge Singal issued his decision in the Penobscot Indian Nation v. Mills lawsuit, in which the Penobscot Indian Nation (PIN