We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 70

“Negligent publication” does not include false advertising or negligent misrepresentation
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • September 10 2008

The United State Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, applying California law, has held that a professional liability policy including coverage for "negligent publication" did not include coverage for class action lawsuits alleging negligent misrepresentation, false advertising and related counts


No coverage for class action where all claims were first made or related back to claims first made prior to the policy period
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • January 27 2014

Applying Michigan law, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan has held that an art gallery's professional liability


The POM Wonderful saga: FTC final order bars POM’s health claims
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • February 28 2013

On January 10, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released its long-awaited final ruling in the Agency's administrative case against POM


Recently filed copyright case highlights potential liability stemming from third-party political advertisements
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2010

A recent case filed against Fox News Network suggests that broadcasters should be more wary of third-party political ads that may infringe upon intellectual property rights


Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals finds public television ban for issue and political advertisements unconstitutional
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • May 17 2012

On April 12, 2012, a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in Minority Television Project v. FCC that the Communications Act’s ban on noncommercial broadcast stations airing political and issue advertising violated the First Amendment


Invasion of privacy exclusion in D&O policy bars coverage for alleged TCPA violations
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • February 18 2014

The United States District Court for the Central District of California has held that an invasion of privacy exclusion in a D&O policy barred


D.C. District Court disagrees with Second Circuit Aereo decision and issues near-nationwide injunction over FilmOn X Internet Television Service
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • September 11 2013

The U.S. District Court in Washington, DC, last week preliminarily enjoined FilmOn X, a service that uses the Internet to give consumers the ability


Aereo wins another round in its battle with copyright owners
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • April 2 2013

On Monday, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction against Aereo, Inc


Federal Circuit patent bulletin: Starhome GmbH v. AT&T Mobility LLC
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2014

"A construction that excludes a preferred embodiment 'is rarely, if ever, correct and would require highly persuasive evidentiary support.'" On


U.S. Supreme Court declines to consider Cablevision challenge to must-carry
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • May 17 2010

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States denied Cablevision's petition for a writ of certiorari asking the Court to consider whether carriage of broadcast station WRNN violates the must-carry statute and the First and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution