We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 295

A warehouse full of unapproved genetically-modified seeds; now what?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 1 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit addressed allegations of breach and false advertising against an agricultural product storage and


Use of athlete’s likeness in video game not protected by First Amendment
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 29 2013

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court affirmed that the First Amendment does not protect a video game developer's unauthorized use of


Release of earnings call audio recording qualifies as fair use news reporting
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 28 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has concluded that when a copyrighted work itself is considered to be news, dissemination of that


Holy non-infringement, Batman!
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 1 2014

The U.S Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a trademark infringement claim, finding that a real computer software


Lack of striking similarity ends The Big C copyright infringement action in the Ninth Circuit
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 27 2012

In an unpublished opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants


Is “insolubly ambiguous” the correct standard to determine compliance with Sec 112?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 5 2014

The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari on a petition challenging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's standard for determining when


The Bill Graham show goes on and on
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 5 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concluded that the federal district court erred in dismissing claims for copyright infringement


Disclosures need not contain customers’ actual names to violate the Video Privacy Protection Act rules Hulu court
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 9 2014

In the latest of a string of victories for the plaintiffs in the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) class action litigation against Hulu, LLC, the U


Fleeting use of work in historic display is fair use
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 5 2014

In deciding the latest dispute in an ongoing battle over the Baltimore Ravens “Flying B” logo, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit


The appropriation artist is a Prince
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 31 2013

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a case involving allegations, against an appropriation artist, of infringement of photographs