We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 9,158

Network interference - a legal guide to the commercial risks and rewards of the social media phenomenon
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • European Union, Global, United Kingdom, USA
  • April 22 2014

Social media is a revolution in the way in which corporations communicate with consumers. This White Paper will help you to maximise the huge


Protecting your trade secrets in the US
  • Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
  • USA
  • May 14 2015

Remember earlier posts about non-disclosure agreements, and the role they play in defining and protecting trade secrets? Of course you dobut in case


Cyber insurance: why you should require certain vendors to have it
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • May 20 2015

One way to protect your business from financial loss, reputational damage, and the expense of regulatory scrutiny in the event of a data breach is to


Court rules no cyberinsurance coverage
  • Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
  • USA
  • May 15 2015

Although not related to any cyberintrusion, a recent ruling related to cyber coverage involved a claim filed was that the defendants "knowingly


Plaintiff lacks standing in eBay data breach suit
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • May 9 2015

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana has rejected a putative class action against eBay alleging that the company was liable


District court dismisses data breach class action against eBay
  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • USA
  • May 15 2015

The US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana recently dismissed a data breach class action against eBay Inc. for lack of standing


FTC comments and background screeners
  • Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
  • USA
  • May 13 2015

I recognize this is a few days late, but the content is still timely. Last month I attended the NAPBS Mid-Year Conference in Washington, DC both as


The perils of redaction: simple steps to protect confidential information
  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

The exchange of confidential information is an inevitable feature of modern litigation. The volume of confidential information has blossomed to the


Data broker’s appeal to U.S. Supreme Court could reshape future of data privacy litigation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 14 2015

In a case that could shape the future of data privacy litigation, the Supreme Court recently agreed to review the decision by the U. S. Court of


No “publication” of IBM’s lost employee data, so no cyberinsurance coverage
  • Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2015

The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that IBM was not entitled to insurance for magnetic tapes that fell off a truck since there was "no evidence that