We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 204

Judge Dismisses Some Claims Related to Site Used to Develop First Atomic Bombs
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • May 25 2017

Recently, in 105 Mt. Kisko Associates, LLC v. Carozza, No. 15 Civ. 5346, 2017 WL 1194700 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2017), the Southern District of New York


EPA Reviewing Obama-Era Power Plant Effluent Rule; Environmental Groups Sue
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • May 24 2017

The U.S. EPA has agreed to a request that it reconsider a rule that set federal limits on the levels of toxic Metals that can be discharged from


EPA Has Much to Reconsider on Power Plant Emissions
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • May 24 2017

Pursuant to President Trump's March 28 "Executive Order on Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth," the EPA has sought to delay and review


EPA Denies Petition to Revoke Tolerances and Cancel all Registrations of the Most Widely Used Conventional Insecticide in the U.S.
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • May 1 2017

The EPA issued an order on April 5, 2017, denying a 2007 petition (the "Cancellation Petition") by the Pesticide Action Network and the Natural


President Trump’s Executive Order Regarding “Waters of the United States” and his Deference to Justice Antonin Scalia: Does it Even Matter?
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • March 9 2017

On Feb. 28, 2017, President Trump issued the Executive Order "Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic Growth by Reviewing the 'Waters of


Does your commercial real estate due diligence checklist consider environmental contamination and insurance coverage?
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • February 2 2017

Two commercial property owners find themselves responsible for decades-old environmental contamination because they failed to conduct proper


$115,000 in Restitution and Guilty Plea to Resolve Asbestos Charges
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • December 5 2016

2013 Investors LLC and two individuals recently pled guilty in Spokane County Superior Court to multiple violations of the Washington Clean Air Act


$900,000 Penalty and Felony Guilty Plea to Resolve Wastewater Dumping Charges
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • December 1 2016

On Oct. 26, 2016, A&L Cesspool Service Corporation (A&L) pled guilty to charges in federal court in Brooklyn, New York for violating the Clean Water


Who Pays When the Other Party Delays? “Loss of Use” Damages and the Recent Michigan Decision Newell Brands, Inc. v. Kirsch Lofts, LLC
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • October 27 2016

When the responsible party and site owner differ, remediation projects can languish at times because the two parties' interests are not aligned. When


EPA Region 7 Reaches $112,684 Settlement with Albaugh, LLC for Alleged FIFRA Violations
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • October 24 2016

EPA and Albaugh, LLC recently reached a $112,684 settlement to resolve allegations that Albaugh violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and