We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 178

IDEM’s new Nonrule Policy regarding RCRA corrective action requirements for subsequent landowners
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • December 7 2015

The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) recently issued Nonrule Policy Document No. MP-008-NPD to express its interpretation of the


Lone Pine order approved for use in Kentucky federal court
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • November 24 2015

Recently, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky approved a Lone Pine case management order in a class action lawsuit


Court rules electric utility settlement costs recoverable from liability insurer
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • September 22 2015

In Louisiana Generating LLC v. Illinois Union Insurance Co., a federal district court ruled that costs incurred by an electric utility under a


Insurance provides coverage for electric utility’s settlement costs
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • September 21 2015

On Aug. 5, 2015, a federal district court in Louisiana ruled that costs incurred by an electric utility under a settlement with the EPA for measures


DC Circuit vacates portions of EPA’s emergency generator rule
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • September 4 2015

Earlier this summer, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision granting in part and denying in part


Fourth Circuit holds that seller of used transformers is not liable as “Arranger” under CERCLA
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • August 6 2015

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the seller of used transformers containing PCBs had no CERCLA "arranger" liability for PCB contamination


Fourth Circuit finds no CERCLA “arranger” liability for the sale of used transformers containing PCBs
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • August 4 2015

In Consolidated Coal Co. v. Georgia Power Co., 781 F.3d 129 (4th Cir. 2015), the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the seller of used


Federal District Court rules that parties cannot “slice and dice” their cleanup costs between CERCLA Sections 107 and 113
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • July 20 2015

In Ford Motor Co., et al. v. Mich. Consolidated Gas Co., et al., Case No. 08-13503, E.D. Mich. (Feb. 10, 2015), the U.S. District Court for the


Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals throws out PM 2.5 attainment status for Cincinnati
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • July 15 2015

On July 14, 2015, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Sierra Club had standing to challenge EPA’s determination that the Cincinnati


Court applies volumetric apportionment under CERCLA in lieu of joint and several liability
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • June 8 2015

In United States v. NCR Corp., a Wisconsin District Court held that recent 7th Circuit guidance in the wake of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway