We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 186

Federal Court Rules Insurers Have Duty to Defend Lawsuit Arising Out of Environmental Contamination Under Business Auto Policies
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • June 23 2016

On June 3, a federal court in California entered a summary judgment ruling finding that two insurers had a duty to defend their insured against


Landowners Win Big in the U.S. Supreme Court: Clean Water Act Jurisdictional Determinations Subject to Judicial Review
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • June 20 2016

With Congress in gridlock and partisanship reaching new heights, it was encouraging to see the U.S. Supreme Court's recent unanimous decision in U.S


NPDES Regulations: New Proposed Changes
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • June 8 2016

EPA recently published a wide-ranging series of proposed changes to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) regulations. While


EPA Issues New Proposed Changes to NPDES Regulations
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • June 7 2016

On May 18, the EPA published a wide-ranging series of proposed changes to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") regulations


Sixth Circuit Limits Contractual Recovery of FIFRA “Data Compensation” Costs
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2016

On May 18, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals resolved a Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act ("FIFRA") dispute between two


IDEM Oversight May Establish Compliance With NCP
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • March 9 2016

To recover cleanup costs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) from a former owner of


IDEM’s new Nonrule Policy regarding RCRA corrective action requirements for subsequent landowners
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • December 7 2015

The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) recently issued Nonrule Policy Document No. MP-008-NPD to express its interpretation of the


Lone Pine order approved for use in Kentucky federal court
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • November 24 2015

Recently, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky approved a Lone Pine case management order in a class action lawsuit


Court rules electric utility settlement costs recoverable from liability insurer
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • September 22 2015

In Louisiana Generating LLC v. Illinois Union Insurance Co., a federal district court ruled that costs incurred by an electric utility under a


Insurance provides coverage for electric utility’s settlement costs
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • September 21 2015

On Aug. 5, 2015, a federal district court in Louisiana ruled that costs incurred by an electric utility under a settlement with the EPA for measures