We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 860

Native American law watch - summer 2015
  • Modrall Sperling
  • USA
  • August 18 2015

On June 26, 2015, in Pueblo of Jemez v. the United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed a district court ruling


How the recent Supreme Court term will affect business
  • Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
  • USA
  • July 23 2015

In Mach Mining, the Supreme Court considered whether and to what extent courts may review the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s attempt to


Native American law watch - Spring 2015
  • Modrall Sperling
  • USA
  • May 18 2015

In Northern Arapaho Tribe v. Ashe, the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming contrasted two tribes’ eagle interests, the First


Native American law watch - spring 2014
  • Modrall Sperling
  • USA
  • March 25 2014

On December 30, 2013, working shoulder to shoulder with its client BHP Billiton New Mexico Coal, Inc. and cocounsel, Modrall Sperling complete


2013 Ohio oil and gas law review
  • Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • February 20 2014

This past year proved active for Ohio's oil and gas industry. We saw exploration and drilling operations increase substantially and migrate further


Does Sackett add to the enforcement defense toolbox for energy companies
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • May 2 2012

In its highly anticipated decision in Sackett v. EPA, the Supreme Court unanimously held that landowners may bring a civil action under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) to challenge an EPA compliance order issued under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”


State AGs in the news
  • Dickstein Shapiro LLP
  • USA
  • June 5 2014

Incumbent AG Luther Strange (R) and Joe Hubbard (D) received their respective party's nomination after both ran unopposed in the primary. California


Fifth Circuit shuts down climate tort plaintiffs again
  • Latham & Watkins LLP
  • USA
  • May 20 2013

Climate tort plaintiffs cannot catch a break in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a May 14, 2013, decision, the Fifth Circuit foundonce


Seeking a safe harbor: can ASTM's BEPA help sellers avoid liability?
  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
  • USA
  • June 13 2011

How do you know if a certain commercial property is energy efficient or inefficient?


MATL dispute headed back to district court
  • Stoel Rives LLP
  • USA
  • June 10 2011

The Montana Supreme Court has reversed a December 2010 district court decision that found that the developers of the Montana-Alberta Tie Line merchant transmission project do not possess eminent domain authority under Montana law and therefore could not take private land from a nonconsenting landowner