We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 27,427

Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage ruling: time to update your FMLA policy (again!)
  • Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson PA
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court held in Obergefell v. Hodges, that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution


Another Illinois appellate decision applies fifield, but a dissent suggests that the issue of what constitutes adequate consideration for a restrictive covenant in Illinois remains open for judicial discussion
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

Readers of this blog know that long settled understandings regarding what constitutes adequate consideration for a restrictive covenant in Illinois


U.S. Supreme Court same-sex marriage decisions: what they may mean and may not mean for employers
  • Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued two recent decisions on same-sex marriage:Obergefell v. Hodges (June 26, 2015) held that states may not refuse to


Second Circuit holds: you can’t always get what you want as long your employer gives you what you need (an effective accommodation)
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • June 29 2015

On May 21, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Noll v. International Business Machines Corporation, Case No. 13-4096


Supreme Court - marriage is a fundamental right
  • Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP
  • USA
  • June 27 2015

Today the Supreme Court ruled that the 14th Amendment requires states to license same-sex marriages and to recognize samesex marriages lawfully


Massachusetts federal court: discretionary bonus not “earned” commission protected by Massachusetts minimum wage act
  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • USA
  • June 27 2015

An employee’s entitlement to incentive compensation continues to be a litigation issue. Recently, a Massachusetts federal district court held that an


Employers, you’ll never pooh-pooh the GINA again.
  • Constangy Brooks Smith & Prophete LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2015

On Monday, a federal jury in Atlanta awarded two hourly warehouse workers $2.2 million in a lawsuit brought under the Genetic Information


Non-solicitation clauses: they’re up to you, New York
  • Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2015

National employers sometimes include choice-of-law provisions in their employment agreements, selecting one particular state's law even for employees


Colorado Supreme Court permits employers to enforce zero-tolerance drug policies against medical cannabis users
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • June 26 2015

On June 15, 2015, the Colorado Supreme Court held that Colorado employers can enforce zero-tolerance drug policies against employees who are


Courts restrict ability of customers and employees to sue companies following a data breach, but risks of other liabilities remain
  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • USA
  • June 26 2015

Among the multitude of unpleasant issues facing a company whose network has been breached is potential liability to customers and employees whose