Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 23 Aug 2017
In an action for copyright infringement, DMCA violation and defamation over critical commentary on creative video posted on YouTube, district court…
Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 8 Jun 2015
Subpoena issued to eBay pursuant to DMCA, seeking to identify alleged infringers, is deemed valid under express statutory language despite eBay’s…
Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 16 Feb 2015
In copyright infringement action involving allegations that Fox News posted to its Facebook page plaintiff's 9/11 photograph of firefighters raising…
Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 30 Jun 2014
U.S. Supreme Court holds that Aereo's near-contemporaneous transmission of broadcast television programs over Internet to subscribers violates…
Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 3 Mar 2014
Ninth Circuit panel rules that Google must remove Innocence of Muslims video from YouTube, concluding that plaintiff actress, who had received death…
Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 17 Oct 2013
District court denies preliminary injunction against Aereo's internet television services, finding local television station unlikely to prevail on…
Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 26 Apr 2013
On remand from the Second Circuit, district court grants summary judgment in favor of Google and its YouTube platform on all copyright infringement…
Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 28 Mar 2013
Ninth Circuit upholds DMCA safe harbor protection from copyright infringement liability for defendant video-sharing site Veoh, affirming grant of summary judgment in defendants’ favor.
Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 19 Jul 2012
District court denies motion of plaintiffs, producers, marketers, and distributors of broadcast television, to enjoin Aereo from continuing that potion of its services that allows subscribers to watch broadcast television content contemporaneously with broadcast, finding Aereo’s service did not constitute public performance of copyrighted content under Second Circuit’s Cablevision decision.
Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 6 Jun 2012
District court grants class certification to group of authors in copyright infringement action against Google, Inc. and recognizes standing of organizations asserting claims on behalf of members, concluding that Google’s plan to digitize millions of books raises common questions and entitles copyright holders to litigate on a group basis.