We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 177

Financial Statement Countdown for Remote Sellers Selling into Alabama
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 16 2015

Remote sellers making sales into Alabama have until January 1, 2016, to begin collecting sales tax regardless of their physical presence in the state


Post-Aliceclaims directed to an abstract idea must have meaningful limitations
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 30 2014

Addressing patent eligibility in a covered business method (CBM) patent review, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board


PTAB grants request for rehearing relating to procedure for serving petitions
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 1 2014

In an order granting a request for rehearing to address the issue of a filing date of a petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and


Wireless does not mean “without wires”; “streaming video” does not mean emailing a video file
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 25 2015

Reviewing a final written decision of U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board), finding application claims unpatentable, the U.S. Court of


Re-Registration of a Domain Name Constitutes “Registration” Under the ACPA
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 25 2016

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a district court ruling imposing a mandatory injunction requiring transfer of certain


Ninth Circuit does an about-face in military watch trademark dispute
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 30 2015

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit previously found that a jury could potentially find that online retailer Amazon.com created a


Portion of California Resale Royalty Act struck down as unconstitutional
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 30 2015

Addressing the constitutionality of California’s Resale Royalty Act, Cal. Civ. Code 986 (“the Act”), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth


Google Books is transformative and therefore a fair use
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 30 2015

Addressing the boundaries of fair use in Copyright Law, the U.S. Court of Appeals for Second Circuit found that the making of digital copies of tens


Do Amazon.com’s search results constitute trademark infringement?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Holding that a reasonable jury could find that online retailer created a likelihood of consumer confusion through the format of its product search


What does it take to trademark your name?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Addressing the question of when a professional name can be protected as a trademark, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that