We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,718

Appeal of first IPR to Federal Circuit Part I: issues presented in briefing
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2014

On November 3, 2014, the Federal Circuit heard oral argument in In re: Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC, No. 2014-1301, the first IPR filed under the


Federal Circuit holds that laches continues to be a viable defense to a claim of patent infringement
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 28 2014

In a recent decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's summary judgment ruling that a patent


Injunctions in trademark cases must take into account totality of the circumstances
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • August 27 2014

Can a U.S. trademark owner sue a foreign defendant for trademark infringement where the defendant has only intended to use (but not yet actually


Federal Circuit reiterates strong presumption against means-plus-function claiming for claim limitations that fail to use the word “means”
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2014

In Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC, No. 13-1130 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 5, 2014), the Federal Circuit vacated a stipulated judgment of noninfringement and


Stay warranted even if covered business method review does not address all asserted patents, claims, or invalidity defenses
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2014

In Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc., No. 14-1468 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 20, 2014), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s denial


Activision’s use of well-known trademark in video game protected under First Amendment
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 17 2014

Although a strong trademark usually favors the plaintiff in infringement actions, in cases involving expressive works subject to First Amendment


Benihana restaurant hopes to block rapper Benny Hunna from trademark registration
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • January 5 2015

Benihana, the nation’s largest operator of teppanyaki restaurants, is fighting to prevent a Mississippi rapper from registering the trademark “Benny


PTAB may flex its discretionary muscle to deny duplicative IPR petitions
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 20 2014

The AIA granted the Board broad discretion to determine how a matter will (or will not) proceed if another matter involving the same patent has been


District court applies recent Supreme Court ruling in awarding attorney fees against the patent owner for failing to timely produce any evidence of infringement
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • August 5 2014

A California federal district court recently awarded attorney fees under Section 285 of the Patent Act to a prevailing defendant in view of the


What does non-discriminatory mean in RAND licensing of standard-essential patents?
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • June 16 2014

Standard-essential patents, or SEPs, often bear an obligation for licensing on reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND, or FRAND with the addition of