We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,349

Last month at the Federal Circuit
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 19 2011

In In re Ricoh Co. Patent Litigation, No. 11-1199 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 23, 2011), the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, and vacated-in-part the district court’s award of costs to Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys”) under 28 U.S.C. 1920 and remanded for further proceedings


Benedict v. Super Bakery, Inc., 101 U.S.Q.P.2d 1089 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 28, 2011)
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • January 25 2012

Respondent failed to timely respond to Petitioner’s discovery requests on multiple occasions, including in violation of two TTAB orders


Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Jiang, No. 11-CV-24049 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 12, 2011)
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • January 25 2012

Defendants used nearly sixty domain names containing plaintiff’s marks for websites selling counterfeit cigarettes bearing those marks


Weather Underground, Inc. v. Navigation Catalyst Sys., Inc., 100 U.S.P.Q.2d 1778 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 9, 2011)
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • January 25 2012

Defendants registered domain names in bulk and made money from pay-per-click advertising on the corresponding websites


Lovely Skin, Inc. v. Ishtar Skin Care Prods., LLC, 2012 WL 379930 (D. Neb. Feb. 6, 2012)
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • March 30 2012

Plaintiff Lovely Skin, Inc. (“Plantiff”) sold skin-care products under the registered mark LOVELY SKIN and operated a website at lovelyskin.com


Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1456 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 21, 2012)
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • March 30 2012

Triumph Learning LLC (“Applicant”) filed use-based trademark applications for the mark COACH in various formats


At the Federal Circuit: inducement and claims drafting
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 18 2012

A party may be liable for inducing infringement of a method claim even if no single actor is liable for the underlying direct infringement


Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta v. Florida Priory of the Knights Hospitallers of the Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, Knights of Malta, The Ecumenical Order, 2012 U.S. App. Lexis 19104 (11t
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 19 2012

Plaintiff Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta, and Defendant Florida Priory of the Knights Hospitallers of the Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, Knights of Malta, The Ecumenical Order, were both charitable religious organizations that shared a long history through a common predecessor between the eleventh and eighteenth centuries


Innovation Ventures, LLC v. N.V.E., Inc., 2012 WL 4039843 (6th Cir. Sept. 13, 2012)
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 19 2012

Living Essentials (“LE”), maker of the 5-HOUR ENERGY shot, brought a claim for trademark infringement against N.V.E., Inc. (“NVE”), a competitor and maker of the 6 HOUR POWER energy shot


Of disparagement, disavowal, and unreasonableness at the USPTO
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 18 2012

There are many things that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), or a district court judge in litigation, considers during the slippery process of claim construction