We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,810

Michael Jordan’s Great Win in Chinaor Is It?
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • China, USA
  • December 12 2016

On December 8, 2016, Beijing time, the China Supreme People’s Court issued a public decision granting Michael Jordan a win in his four-year battle


U.S. Supreme Court Reverses Apple’s Nearly $400M Verdict in Smartphone Case, but Leaves Many Questions Unresolved
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 9 2016

On Tuesday, December 6, the United States Supreme Court issued its first opinion in a design patent case in more than 120 years. The issue before the


The Federal Circuit vacates TTAB ruling because the Board failed to properly consider evidence of third-party use
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • August 6 2015

On July 20, 2015, the Federal Circuit vacated a TTAB decision finding the mark PEACE LOVE AND JUICE & Design to be confusingly similar to a family of


Podcast: Elizabeth Niemeyer on the Federal Circuit's Decision in ClearCorrect v. ITC
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • March 3 2016

The United States International Trade Commission (ITC) is authorized to prevent the importation of articles that infringe a valid U.S. patent


AIA First Inventor to File Statistics
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • March 4 2016

In the February installment of its Patent Quality Chats, the USPTO presented statistics on AIA First Inventor to File (FITF) applications. FITF


Obviousness developments in US patent law
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • June 30 2009

Since its issuance in 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the landmark case of KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398 (2007) (hereafter, "KSR") appears generally to have raised the bar for patentability under 35 U.S.C. 103


Podcast: Christine Lehman, Anthony Del Monaco, and Smith Brittingham on the dangers of ITC consent orders
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • May 18 2015

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) frequently oversees cases where parties allege foreign imports infringe upon U.S. intellectual property


Federal Circuit scratches out District Court determination that rock carving is analogous prior art for circuit board interface plates
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • July 30 2015

In Circuit Check Inc. v. QXQ Inc., No 15-1155 (Fed. Cir. July 28, 2015), the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded the Eastern District of Wisconsin's


Best kept secret: are dilution claims based on "blurring" still viable?
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • July 31 2008

Nearly a decade after Victoria's Secret filed suit to enjoin the use of the name VICTOR'S LITTLE SECRET for an adult novelty store, on May 21, 2008 the U.S. District Court in Kentucky finally resolved the case in Victoria's Secret's favour


Podcast: Jeffrey Totten and Jason Stach on the Changes to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Electronically Stored Information
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 15 2015

New amendments to the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure took effect on December 1, 2015 and the amendments impact several areas of patent