We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,642

Standards and patents: lessons from the Rambus cases
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • China, USA
  • June 13 2008

In recent years, China's electronics industry has struggled to compete in the manufacture and sale of products ranging from MP3 players to digital TVs


Through the PTAB looking glass: post-Alice supplemental papers
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • July 31 2014

The Supreme Court's decision in Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int'l, No. 13-298, __ U.S. __, 2014 WL 2765283 (U.S. June 19, 2014) has prompted


Expert's opinion on FRAND reasonable royalty rate is excluded from evidence for relying on licenses covering technologies beyond the patents-in-suit without accounting for any differences
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • July 15 2014

A California district court excluded an expert's opinion of a reasonable royalty rate from being considered as evidence at trial because the expert


Fair use defense generally inapplicable in Board proceedings
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2015

Is the very fact of applying for a trademark registration inconsistent with a parody or fair use defense? In a recent precedential decision that


Podcast: Michael Jakes on Federal Circuit patent cases overturned by SCOTUS
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 31 2014

In part four of our Federal Circuit podcast series, Finnegan attorney Michael Jakes discusses the trend of the Supreme Court overturning Federal


“Underhanded” settlement tactics did not constitute fraud
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • January 9 2015

The Southern District of Indiana recently issued a decision reiterating the "steep mountain" plaintiffs must climb to successfully allege common law


Court finds naked licensing of “Movie Mania” trademark under state law
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • September 26 2014

In a recent state court trademark decision, Movie Mania Metro, Inc. v. GZ DVD's Inc., No. 311723 (Sept. 9, 2014), the Michigan Court of Appeals held


Stay warranted even if covered business method review does not address all asserted patents, claims, or invalidity defenses
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2014

In Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc., No. 14-1468 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 20, 2014), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s denial


Activision’s use of well-known trademark in video game protected under First Amendment
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 17 2014

Although a strong trademark usually favors the plaintiff in infringement actions, in cases involving expressive works subject to First Amendment


Divided TTAB panel cancels six REDSKINS trademarks on disparagement grounds
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2014

In a high-profile precedential decision, a divided TTAB panel cancelled six REDSKINS trademarks for various entertainment services including