We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,431

The board grants first opposed motions to amend in two IPR trials (part I)
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • January 16 2015

The PTAB granted-in-part the first opposed motions to amend in two IPR trials concerning network memory systems. Riverbed Technology, Inc. v. Silver


First CBM claims survive review, first contested Motions to Amend granted-in-part
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • January 22 2015

December was a big monthand an interesting way to end 2015at the PTAB. As our updated statistics show, claims have finally survived CBM review, and


The Board grants first opposed motions to amend in two IPR trials (part II): when throwing stones at birds, Board prefers seeing one bird hit with two stones
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • January 21 2015

When throwing stones at birds, the Riverbed decisions highlight that Patent Owners and the Board may have different views on which bird got hit by


E.D. Pa. grants Sweet trade dress victory for pastry maker
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • January 20 2015

The Eastern District of Pennsylvania recently resolved a food design trade dress case on summary judgment finding functionality and thereby no


Patent prosecution update - January 2015
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • January 15 2015

In Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, 772 F.3d 709 (Fed. Cir. 2014), the Federal Circuit applied the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Alice Corp. v. CLS


Injunction issued against patent infringer despite patent owner not practicing the patent
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • November 11 2014

In Sealant Systems International, Inc. v. TEK Global, S.R.L., the Northern District of California did the unusual; it issued a permanent injunction


Licensee's breach of agreement provides licensor with ability to sue licensee for infringement
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • February 2 2015

While settlement agreements are often intended to fully and finally resolve disputes between the parties, a failure to comply with the terms of a


How patent owners can increase their odds: lessons learned from recent IPR decisions
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • August 12 2014

IPR proceedings are a risky proposition for patent owners. Statistics provided by the USPTO show that, as of August 2, 2014, the Board has upheld


Last month at the Federal Circuit - August 2014
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • August 27 2014

In MadStad Engineering, Inc. v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, Nos. 13-1511, -1512 (Fed. Cir. July 1, 2014), the Federal Circuit affirmed the


Patent co-owner may prevent other co-owners from enforcing jointly-owned patents by refusing to join an infringement suit and may not be involuntarily joined as a party
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • September 2 2014

The Federal Circuit has long held that a patent co-owner seeking to maintain a patent-infringement suit must join all other co-owners. Co-owners