We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 257

Resealable cookie packaging patent invalidated as obvious in Kraft- Kellogg dispute
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 7 2015

An Illinois federal court has granted summary judgment in favor of Kellogg North America Co. in a lawsuit disputing the patented design of resealable


Second Circuit antitrust decision creates uncer tainty for non-practice of patents
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 11 2015

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit's recent decision in New York v. Actavis PLC appeared on its face to address a narrow issue of


Two sides to the lens: U.S. Supreme Court and Federal Circuit take different views?
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 28 2015

Has justice become blinded to fundamental differences between the way patent law is interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit


Jury finds for Heinz in “Dip & Squeeze” packet dispute
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 3 2015

A federal jury in Pennsylvania has found that H.J. Heinz Co. did not appropriate the idea of a dual-opening condiment packaging, the "Dip & Squeeze"


Heinz “Dip & Squeeze” suit headed to trial
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 23 2015

A Pennsylvania federal court has denied H.J. Heinz Co.'s motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit alleging that the company stole the idea for the


Federal Circuit affirms USDA’s grape patents
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 16 2015

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a lower court's ruling that unauthorized public use of the Scarlet Royal and Autumn King varieties


Apportionment gets a whole lot of attention in landmark Virnetx, Inc. v. Apple Inc . (part I)
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 8 2015

The Federal Circuit delivered its clearest, most in-depth damages opinion in more than two years in VirnetX, Inc. v. Apple Inc. The court now (1


Dissatisfied patent reexamination plaintiff contends standing conferred by statute
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • November 13 2014

A consumer-interest organization that was dissatisfied by a Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) ruling in the appeal of a patent


Australian court finds human gene mutation to be patentable
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • Australia, USA
  • September 11 2014

A full panel of the Federal Court of Australia has upheld its earlier ruling that an isolated but naturally occurring nucleic acid, BRCA1, can be


Federal Circuit rules jurisdiction lacking in Vermont dispute with patent assertion entity
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 21 2014

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that it lacks jurisdiction to review a district court ruling remanding to state court for lack of