We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 195

Federal Circuit addresses personal jurisdiction in patent infringement litigation
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 30 2012

Finding that the U.S. Supreme Court “has yet to reach a consensus on the proper articulation of the stream-of-commerce theory” of personal jurisdiction to assess whether a court has jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant in a patent infringement suit, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has applied its own theory, which assesses the pleadings and evidence under “any articulation of the stream-of-commerce theory,” and has determined that a district court in Wyoming properly dismissed two patent infringement lawsuits for lack of jurisdiction


Eighth Circuit says pleadings can be filed under seal, but needs more justification
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • February 21 2013

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that a federal district court did not abuse its discretion in sealing an antitrust complaint


Federal Circuit clarifies permanent injunction standard
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • October 20 2011

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has clarified that, while a judgment of patent infringement and validity does not constitute a presumption of irreparable harm “as it applies to determining the appropriateness of injunctive relief,” the judgment should not be ignored by the court when weighing the equities involved in deciding whether to impose a permanent injunction


23andMe insurer claims no duty to defend company
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 7 2014

The insurance carrier that issued a "ProductsCompleted Operations Liability and Professional Liability Policy for Life Sciences" policy to 23andMe


Myriad Genetics brings new BRCA1BRCA2 infringement suits
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2013

Myriad Genetics now reportedly has six pending infringement lawsuits involving its BRCA1 and BRCA2 patents, with Invitae Corp. and Laboratory Corp


Court appoints damages expert in patent infringement lawsuit
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 22 2011

Taking an apparently unusual step, a federal court in California has reportedly appointed an expert to testify on damages in patent infringement litigation that has generated contentious hearings over the issue between Oracle America Inc. and Google Inc


Federal court finds alleged reputational damage sufficient for standing
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 26 2013

A federal court in Florida has determined that the assertion of a purely reputational interest by a periodontist and implant surgeon who filed an


U.S. Supreme Court refuses to consider patent dispute over vascular grafts
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 24 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court has denied the petition for review filed by W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. in a dispute over the patent for a prosthetic


Ambry Genetics countersues Myriad Genetics in genetic patent infringement suit
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 15 2013

Responding to the patent infringement claims asserted against it by Myriad Genetics, Ambry Genetics Corp. denies that the 15 patents at issue were


Compounding pharmacy enters consent decree with FDA
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 11 2013

As part of its efforts to ensure the safety of compounded pharmaceuticals since a Hepatitis A outbreak was traced in 2012 to a drug compounding