We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 195

Federal Circuit allows Apple and Samsung to seal confidential documents used in patent dispute
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2013

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that a district court erred in refusing to seal or allow the redaction of confidential exhibits


Federal Circuit addresses personal jurisdiction in patent infringement litigation
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 30 2012

Finding that the U.S. Supreme Court “has yet to reach a consensus on the proper articulation of the stream-of-commerce theory” of personal jurisdiction to assess whether a court has jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant in a patent infringement suit, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has applied its own theory, which assesses the pleadings and evidence under “any articulation of the stream-of-commerce theory,” and has determined that a district court in Wyoming properly dismissed two patent infringement lawsuits for lack of jurisdiction


Federal Circuit upholds inequitable conduct ruling; patent unenforceable
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • October 17 2013

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that a district court did not err in finding that the inequitable conduct of the inventor of


23andMe insurer claims no duty to defend company
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 7 2014

The insurance carrier that issued a "ProductsCompleted Operations Liability and Professional Liability Policy for Life Sciences" policy to 23andMe


Court orders dispute over 23andMe DNA test kits to arbitration
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 17 2014

A multidistrict litigation court in California has ordered false-advertising, class-action claims filed against personal genetics company 23andMe to


Court imposes sanctions on Apple for shutting down deposition
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 16 2012

A federal court in Texas has determined that counsel for Apple had no basis for bringing to a premature close the deposition of one of its engineering managers in a lawsuit asserting VirnetX’s patent against an Apple patent application


French company prevails in dispute with FDA over drug-classification ruling
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • October 3 2012

A federal court in the District of Columbia has determined that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) erred when it classified a combination drug-device product as primarily a drug, thus subjecting its French manufacturer to more burdensome regulatory requirements


Class action filed against 23andMe, Inc. over efficacy of home DNA test kits
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 30 2014

A New Mexico resident has filed a putative nationwide class action against 23andMe, Inc., alleging that claims for its DNA Collection Kits&mdash


New York AG settles with patent assertion entity
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 30 2014

New York Attorney General (AG) Eric Schneiderman has entered an agreement with MPHJ Technology, a patent assertion entity (PAE) operated by Texas


Second Circuit rules scientific article not actionable under Lanham Act
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 11 2013

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that "to the extent a speaker or author draws conclusions from non-fraudulent data, based on