We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 194

Eighth Circuit says pleadings can be filed under seal, but needs more justification
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • February 21 2013

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that a federal district court did not abuse its discretion in sealing an antitrust complaint


Court orders dispute over 23andMe DNA test kits to arbitration
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 17 2014

A multidistrict litigation court in California has ordered false-advertising, class-action claims filed against personal genetics company 23andMe to


Court imposes sanctions on Apple for shutting down deposition
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 16 2012

A federal court in Texas has determined that counsel for Apple had no basis for bringing to a premature close the deposition of one of its engineering managers in a lawsuit asserting VirnetX’s patent against an Apple patent application


Federal Circuit addresses personal jurisdiction in patent infringement litigation
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 30 2012

Finding that the U.S. Supreme Court “has yet to reach a consensus on the proper articulation of the stream-of-commerce theory” of personal jurisdiction to assess whether a court has jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant in a patent infringement suit, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has applied its own theory, which assesses the pleadings and evidence under “any articulation of the stream-of-commerce theory,” and has determined that a district court in Wyoming properly dismissed two patent infringement lawsuits for lack of jurisdiction


Federal Circuit allows Apple and Samsung to seal confidential documents used in patent dispute
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2013

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that a district court erred in refusing to seal or allow the redaction of confidential exhibits


GAO releases report on patent infringement litigation and its consequences
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 12 2013

The America Invents Act (AIA) mandated that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) conduct a study on the consequences of patent litigation


Federal court finds alleged reputational damage sufficient for standing
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 26 2013

A federal court in Florida has determined that the assertion of a purely reputational interest by a periodontist and implant surgeon who filed an


Court dismisses fraud claims against investors who sued biotech startup
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • February 7 2011

A federal court in California has granted in part the motion that two biotech startup investors filed under the state's anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) law to dismiss the company's counterclaims against them


Class action filed against 23andMe, Inc. over efficacy of home DNA test kits
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 30 2014

A New Mexico resident has filed a putative nationwide class action against 23andMe, Inc., alleging that claims for its DNA Collection Kits&mdash


Myriad Genetics calls on Scotus to reject petition from ruling finding DNA molecules patent-eligible
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • November 15 2012

According to Myriad Genetics, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court should not grant review in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. Details about the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals decision on remand from the lawsuit’s previous sojourn before the U.S. Supreme Court appear in Issue 41 of this Bulletin