We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 32

Federal court remands ear drops false ad claims, CAFA minimum not met
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 8 2014

A federal court in California has determined that the defendants in litigation alleging false advertising, marketing and sale of an earache relief


SCOTUS grants cert. on Lanham Act standing for false advertising claims
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • June 13 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court has decided to review whether an entity may bring a claim for false advertising under the Lanham Act against a defendant that


Judge-written opinions preferable to clerk-drafted?
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • December 19 2013

"Posner not only describes pitfalls in the decision process for appeals, but also explains some of what he does (and thinks other judges should do


Class certification denied in false claims suit against beauty product manufacturer
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 31 2013

A federal court in California has denied a motion for class certification in a suit alleging that Neutrogena Corp. misled consumers by advertising


Putative class challenges validity of ''magnetic wave technology'' therapeutic claims
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 5 2012

A California resident has filed a putative statewide class action against a company that purportedly makes a line of products “labeled and advertised as possessing ‘Magnetic Wave Technology’” and “falsely implies that the magnets have a therapeutic value, when in reality there is no scientific evidence that the magnets are of any therapeutic or any other health-related value.”


Federal court denies class certification request in ''made in the USA'' tools case
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 5 2012

In the last remaining case of multidistrict litigation alleging that Sears, Roebuck & Co. misled consumers by advertising its line of Craftsman tools, now mostly made abroad, as manufactured in the United States, a federal court has dismissed a count brought under federal warranty law and denied the plaintiff’s motion to certify a statewide class of claimants


Putative class challenges “Super Stay” lipstick advertising claims
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • October 11 2012

Plaintiffs from three states have filed a putative class action against Maybelline, LLC, alleging that the company’s marketing and promotions highlighting the long-lasting qualities of its lipstick are misleading, inaccurate and deceptive


New Jersey Supreme Court faults trial court’s class-certification analysis in consumer-fraud action
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • October 14 2010

The New Jersey Supreme Court has reversed lower court rulings denying a motion to certify a statewide class of consumers who purchased a dietary supplement that allegedly fails to deliver its promised benefits


Class action filed against soap manufacturer for false advertising
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2010

An Illinois man has filed a putative class action against the maker of an antibacterial hand soap contending that the product is no better than regular soap at killing germs but is deceptively advertised as superior to other soap products and sold at a premium price


Federal court dismisses claims in defective Wii class action
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • March 18 2010

A federal court in Colorado has dismissed putative class claims based on Washington law filed by residents of other states against Nintendo, alleging that the company's Wii controllers are defective because they slipped out of their hands during play and caused damage in their homes