We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,803

IRS denied peek behind the curtain: District Court protects Wells Fargo’s tax accrual workpapers
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 12 2013

In an important taxpayer victory, a Minnesota District Court ruled in favor of Wells Fargo, holding that the measurement and analysis of its


FTC asks court to reverse payment decision
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 12 2014

On May 2, 2014, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit requesting that the


Certification pledge is not enough to avoid infringement in Hatch-Waxman litigation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2013

Addressing a decision regarding infringement by a generic version of Lunesta, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a


An ITC complainant must prove the existence of articles protected by the patent to satisfy the domestic industry requirement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2013

Addressing the domestic industry requirement in 337 investigations at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), the U.S. Court of


The law of software subject-matter eligibility remains unsettled
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2013

Revisiting the issue of patent subject-matter eligibility in software patents, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower


Safe harbor provision of 35 U.S.C. 121 does not apply when consonance is not maintained
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2013

Addressing whether the safe harbor provision of 35 U.S.C. 121 protects a patent from invalidity due to double patenting, the U.S. Court of


Objective evidence of non-obviousness can be the most probative record evidence on obviousness
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2013

Addressing a a finding of obviousness by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), the U.S. Court of


No case or controversy in DJ against patentee who sued manufacturer’s customers
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2013

In a non-precedential opinion addressing declaratory judgment jurisdiction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district


Architectural copyrights should be treated no differently than other copyrights
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 27 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in addressing the extent to which architectural works are protectable copyright material and the


Disclosure of a single embodiment can provide sufficient written description
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • June 27 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), finding that the disclosure of a single