We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,890

Hut, Hut, phlmph Florida judge denies dismissal of tax on delivery charges lawsuit
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 10 2015

In the latest development in the Florida litigation regarding the taxation of delivery charges, Judge Jack Tuter of the 17th Judicial Circuit Court


Whose intent to evade tax is it?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 5 2015

On July 29, 2015, the Federal Circuit, rejecting the Tax Court’s decision in Allen v. Commissioner, 128 T.C. 37 (2007), held in BASR Partnership v


Government’s Case Dismissed Due to Inability to Allege False Claims With Particularity
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 26 2016

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida recently dismissed the Government’s False Claims Act case against Liberty


Shall means shall . . . unless it doesn’t
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Addressing issues of first impression related to the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCIA), which the U.S. Court of Appeals


Lesson 1keep PTAB petitions clean and simple
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Addressing the procedures for seeking a Covered Business Method (CBM) review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) declined to institute


Printed publication in IPR
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Addressing the requirements for proof of prior art in Inter Partes Review (IPR), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) found that the


Proof of confusion essential for trademark injunction
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Addressing the likelihood of success requirement for injunctive relief, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit vacated an order requiring


USPTO releases update on subject-matter eligibility
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

On July 30, 2015, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released an update to the 2014 Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility


Sublicensee’s purchase of licensee not prohibited under the license agreement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that a sublicensee of patent and trademark rights that purchased its sublicensor in order to


PTO has broad discretion in considering extraordinary situations for Patent Term Adjustment
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 27 2015

Addressing the U.S. Patent Office’s (USPTO) discretion in connection with patent term adjustments, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit