We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,839

Patent marking: an extrajudicial admission that the product is covered by the patent but not an estoppel
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 30 2013

Addressing for the first time whether marking a product with a patent number creates an estoppel preventing a later assertion that the product is not


Who’s in charge is the board responsible to monitor its financial advisor or vice versa?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 21 2014

In the case of In re Rural Metro Corporation Stockholders Litigation, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware held that the primary financial


Patent exhaustion rejected: patented seed purchaser has no right to make copies
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • May 16 2013

The Supreme Court in Bowman v. Monsanto Co. ruled unanimously that a farmer's replanting of harvested seeds constituted making new infringing


Failure to raise patent validity challenges in breach of license suit precludes later invalidity and misuse claims
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 31 2013

Addressing the res judicata effect of prior licensing litigation on a subsequent patent case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit


Supreme Court upholds ERISA plan’s three-year deadline to file a lawsuit
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 17 2013

The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that an ERISA plan may properly impose a reasonable time limit on filing a lawsuit to recover benefits


Actions under 337 based on inducement require existence of direct infringement prior to importation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • December 17 2013

In a case of first impression, a divided U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit panel ruled that an exclusion order based on a violation of


Ninth Circuit Says Oui to French Copyright-Infringement Award
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • France, USA
  • October 26 2016

Addressing whether federal courts may go outside the pleadings when ruling on a motion to dismiss premised on foreign law, the US Court of Appeals


Ninth Circuit affirms divestiture of consummated physician practice acquisition
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 27 2015

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed an Idaho federal district court’s decision ordering the divestiture of a physician practice


District courts must follow Georgia-Pacific & Seagate’s instructions
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2015

Addressing the analysis required to support both damages and willfulness, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a district


Illinois amends eavesdropping statute in response to recent court decisions
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • January 29 2015

On March 20, 2014, the Illinois Supreme Court held that significant portions of the Illinois eavesdropping statute, 720 ILCS 514-1 et seq., (the