We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,683

Timeliness the devil is in the details (a.k.a. Rules)
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

In an order issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board), the Board expunged exhibits from the records of five related cases on the


Inventor testimony without corroborating evidence is insufficient to prove of reduction to practice
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

Addressing the sufficiency of corroborating evidence to prove earlier reduction to practice, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) found that an


PTAB denies motion to amend for failure to show patentability
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

Addressing a patent owner’s motion to amend by cancelling claims and substituting claims, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and


“Soda-pop” bottle caps can be analogous art for flash chromatography cartridges
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

Addressing the issue of analogous art in the context of inter partes reexamination, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a


Method implemented on generic computers is not patent eligible, but method for processing paper checks is
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

In a pair of Covered Business Method (CBM) decisions, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) illustrated


PTAB clarifies permissible use of documents and evidence
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

In two recent Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) addressed the scope


Patent owner must prove patentability of proposed amended claims (including prior art date)
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 29 2014

In an order addressing a motion for a sur-reply to introduce evidence to antedate a prior art reference in an Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceeding


Supreme Court asked to clarify the reach of U.S. antitrust laws to foreign conduct
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • March 24 2015

On March 16, 2015, AU Optronics Corporation America Inc. (AU Optronics) and Motorola Mobility LLC separately asked the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify


Seventh Circuit upholds dismissal of text messaging price-fixing claims
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • April 16 2015

On Thursday, April 9, 2015, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment for AT&T Mobility LLC, Verizon Wireless LLC


Federal Circuit affirms PTAB’s lack of patentability ruling in first-ever AIA review
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 25 2015

Addressing for the first time an appeal of an America Invents Act review decision out of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's (PTO's) Patent Trial