We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 598

Negotiated Litigation Reserve Not Protected Work Product
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 14 2016

Judge Rowland granted in part defendants’ motion for a protective order preventing production of their Equity Purchase Agreement


Covered business method review of four of fifteen patents warrants stay
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • May 22 2015

Judge Kendall granted defendants’ motion to stay this patent litigation pending the Patent Office’s (“PTO”) Covered Business Method Review (“CBM”) of


Court Sua Sponte Dismisses Patent Case for Improper Venue
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 9 2016

Judge Shadur sua sponte dismissed plaintiff Anuwave’s patent complaint for improper venue with leave


Specific Jurisdiction Over Entity Does Not Guarantee Jurisdiction Over its Corporate Parent
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 7 2016

Judge Gettleman denied defendant Char-Broil’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and granted


January 2015 retail patent litigation report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 4 2015

Litigation against retailers was relatively quiet in January. Repeat filers included ArrivalStar, Eclipse IP, Hawk Technologies, and Landmark


Plaintiff Allowed to Amend Complaint to Fix Clerical Errors
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 11 2015

Judge Coleman granted defendants Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 and 17 motion to amend its first amended complaint to state that it was a Texas entity with a


Patent application publication does not trigger statute of limitation at pleadings stage
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 27 2015

Judge Tharp denied Defendant’s (collectively “Curaline”) Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff Ferris’ Lanham Act and related state law


Expert may not speculate on an examiner’s hypothetical reactions
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 5 2014

Judge St. Eve granted in part and denied in part plaintiff The Medicine Company's ("TMC") Daubert motion seeking to exclude certain opinions of


February 2015 retail patent litigation report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 11 2015

Litigation against retailers began picking up in February. Repeat filers included ArrivalStar, Data Carriers, Eclipse IP, and Hawk Technologies. As


Court Construes Claims Without Deciding Level of Ordinary Skill Because it is Irrelevant to Current Issues
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • November 30 2016

Kolcraft Enters., Inc. v. Chicco USA, Inc., No. 09 C 3339, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Sep. 2, 2016) (Chang, J