We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 593

Factual Disputes Prevent Summary Judgment of Patent Infringement
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • October 26 2016

LoggerHead Tools, LLC v. Sears Holding Corp., No. 12 C 9033, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Sep. 20, 2016) (Darrah, J.). Judge Darrah denied plaintiffs


Damages Expert’s Inability to Precisely Calculate a Factor Goes to Weight, Not Admissibility
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2016

Judge Darrah granted in part defendant Apex’s motion to exclude plaintiff Loggerhead’s damages expert’s testimony in this IP case involving the Bionic


Claim construction reconsidered in motion in limine
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 24 2013

Judge Lefkow considered defendant ISE’s arguments that the Court’s construction of “means for matching” was incomplete because it did not define an


Court has jurisdiction over foreign defendant but service was not perfected
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 2 2013

Judge Kennelly granted in part defendant U Lighting Group’s (“ULG”) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s patent case for lack of personal jurisdiction and


Interactive website does not create personal jurisdiction
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 10 2013

Judge Shadur granted defendant LeaseWeb USA (“LeaseWeb”) Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) & (6) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and


Will a patent rights exchange help solve the troll problem?
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 15 2013

Chicago-based Intellectual Property Exchange ("IPXI") plans to offer its first patent family for purchase via what IPXI calls unit license rights


Expert Willfulness Testimony Excluded Because it Would Not Assist a Lay Jury
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • October 3 2016

Judge Darrah granted in part plaintiff Loggerhead’s motion to exclude defendant Apex’s expert’s opinions regarding willfulness and obviousness in


Motion to add counterclaim granted where schedule has ample time for discovery
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 29 2013

Chief Judge Holderman granted defendant Loopnet’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) motion to amend its answer and counterclaims add a counterclaim for breach


Courtesy copies of complaints required by Local Rule 5.2(f)
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 29 2013

In each of these cases, Judge Shadur entered similar orders requiring the plaintiff to provide the Court a courtesy copy of its newly filed complaint


Parent cannot seek lost profits based upon subsidiaries sales
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 5 2013

Judge Holderman granted defendants (collectively “Tellabs”) summary judgment that plaintiff Fujitsu Limited was not able to seek lost profits in this