We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 566

Rule 30(b)(6) witness cannot be instructed not to answer questions about a noticed topic
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 31 2013

Judge Cox granted defendants’ (collectively “Crimson”) motion to compel answers to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) deposition questions and for sanctions in


Court construes pharmaceutical terms
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 26 2012

Judge St. Eve construed the claims in this patent case related to bivalirudin. Of particular note: “Pharmaceutical Batches” was construed as “may include


Discovery limited to avoid a fishing expedition
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 5 2013

Judge Keys granted in part defendant MBHB’s motion to compel document production and request for admission responses in this copyright case involving


Patents held unenforceable after bench trial
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • January 9 2013

Judge Hart entered findings of fact and conclusions of law after a patent bench trial related to cell phones with caller ID, text messaging, pictures or


Plaintiff may not communicate with Does in BitTorrent case by email or phone
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 17 2014

Judge Gottschall denied two Doe defendants’ motions to quash subpoenas to their respective ISPs seeking, among other things, their identities based


Illinois witnesses not sufficient to retain case where Michigan witnesses provide same proof
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 26 2013

Judge Coleman granted defendant Rapid Detox’s 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) motion to transfer this patent infringement case to the Eastern District of Michigan


Not accepting well-pled allegations is “cardinal sin” of affirmative defenses
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 1 2014

Judge Shadur sua sponte struck portions of defendant iRobot’s answer and affirmative defenses, and allowed other portions to be repled. Of particular


Induced infringement claims need not use the word “induce”
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • January 23 2013

Judge Kocoras denied defendants’ Beissbarth GmbH (“Beissbarth”) and Robert Bosch, GmbH’s (“Bosch Germany”) (collectively “German Defendants”) Fed. R


March 2013 retail patent litigation report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 22 2013

March was moderately busy with several frequent fliers, including: ArrivalStar, Eclipse IP and Princeton Digital. As usual, I prepared the report in


Knowledge from date of complaint sufficient for indirect infringement
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2012

Judge Coleman granted in part defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff Radiation Stabilization Solutions’ (“RSS”) claims in this patent infringement suit regarding technology for stabilizing irradiated targets