We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 564

Estoppel applies to materially similar patent claims
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 16 2015

Judge Coleman granted in part declaratory judgment defendant Beacon Point Capital’s (“Beacon”) Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) & (6) motion to dismiss


Settlement arbitration clause requires patent claims be arbitrated
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 11 2014

Judge Chang granted defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(3) motion to dismiss for improper venue because Plaintiff’s design patent declaratory judgment


Limiting interrogatory language allows limited response
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 18 2014

Judge St. Eve granted in part defendant Electro Power’s motion to compel further interrogatory responses and denied Electro Power’s motion to compel


December 2013 retail patent litigation report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • June 17 2014

The trolls ended the year quietly, as they often do. Repeat filers included ArrivalStar, Eclipse IP, GPNE and Wolf Run Hollow. As usual, I prepared


Court allows joinder of BitTorrent Does for early stages of case - 24 January, 2014
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • January 24 2014

Judge Gottschall denied various Doe defendants’ motions to quash third party subpoenas to their respective internet service providers (ISPs) as well


March 2014 retail patent litigation report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • September 23 2014

March continued to be a pleasantly slow months for trolls. Repeat filers included Cascades Branding, Eclipse IP, Hawk Technology, Marshall Feature


De minimis sales create specific jurisdiction
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • March 18 2015

Judge Kocoras denied Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or to transfer to the E.D. New York


District court claim constructions not controlling
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2014

Judge Holderman construed the disputed claim terms in this patent case involving methods of locating points of interest in a geographic region by


February 2015 retail patent litigation report
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • August 11 2015

Litigation against retailers began picking up in February. Repeat filers included ArrivalStar, Data Carriers, Eclipse IP, and Hawk Technologies. As


Indirect infringement may be pled without detailed allegations
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • April 6 2015

Judge Coleman denied Wendy’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss plaintiff Marshall Feature Recognition’s (“MFR”) patent complaint accusing QR