We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 299

Light-duty vehicle emissions rule challenged
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • December 16 2012

The Utility Air Regulatory Group filed a petition for review December 13 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit challenging the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s October fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions standards for light-duty trucks and model years 2017 to 2025


MA upholds wind purchase agreement
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • January 8 2012

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld a 15 year power purchase agreement between Cape Wind and National Grid December 28


EPSA challenges compensation method
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • January 8 2012

The Electric Power Supply Association asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit December 23 to review a March 2011 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rule that requires compensation for demand response programs that are aimed at reducing the demand for wholesale electricity during peak hours


Controls for SW plants sought
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • March 25 2012

The National Parks Conservation Association and Diné CARE, a Navajo tribal environmental group, filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief March 19 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging that the Environmental Protection Agency failed to require modern pollution controls for two power plants in Arizona and New Mexico


CSAPR decision appealed
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • October 7 2012

The Environmental Protection Agency asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit October 5 for a rehearing of an August 21 decision to vacate the Cross-State Air Rule


CA low-carbon fuel standard challenged
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • October 14 2012

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit will hear October 16 a lawsuit brought by industry groups, including the Renewable Fuels Association and the National Petroleum & Refiners Association, challenging California’s landmark low-carbon fuel standard


Coal ash regulations
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • October 14 2012

The Environmental Protection Agency’s director of resource conservation and recovery, Suzanne Rudzinski, stated in a declaration filed October 11 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that it would take at least one year to complete revisions of the toxicity characteristic and toxicity characteristic leaching procedure regulations


GHG permitting challenged
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • September 16 2012

The American Petroleum Institute, American Fuel and Petrochemicals Manufacturers, National Association of Manufacturers, and the National Oilseed Processors Association filed suit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit September 10 challenging the third step of the Environmental Protection Agency’s tailoring rule


Air toxics determination challenged
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • September 16 2012

During oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit September 12, the Sierra Club asked the court to vacate the Environmental Protection Agency’s determination that it had satisfied Clean Air Act requirements to reduce emissions of certain air toxics


TX standing questioned
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • September 16 2012

The Clean Air Task Force, Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Sierra Club intervened on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency in a September 7 brief filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit