We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 28

Street art: the everlasting divide between graffiti art and intellectual property protection
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2015

Does intellectual property law protect unsanctioned graffiti art? With the rising appreciation for street art, this is a question of growing


What you don't know about IP protection for social games can hurt you
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • June 21 2011

Copying within the games industry is prevalent


Advertisers beware: it’s not easy being ‘green’ when regulators are watching
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • July 1 2010

A store in San Francisco recently received a makeover: a new coat of ecrucolored paint, a large green-colored logo and the addition of the term GREEN to its previous store name


Court: implementing proper DMCA policy provides website operators ‘safe harbor’ from copyright infringement
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • June 28 2010

Google has prevailed in the closely watched lawsuit against its YouTube website by Viacom, with the federal district court granting summary judgment in favor of Google


Court says Copyright Royalty Board can legally set webcasters' royalty payments
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2010

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has ruled that the Copyright Royalty Board is constitutional


10 frequently asked questions about virtual worlds
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • September 18 2009

Internet techonology is on the cusp of a transformation as significant as the popularization of the World Wide Web in the 1990s


Internet radio royalty dispute reaching endfor now
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • August 18 2009

The long-running battle over royalties owed by webcasterscompanies that broadcast music over the Internettook several significant leaps towards conclusion last month with important developments both inside and outside of the courtroom


Licensing and royalty requirements for webcasters: details and deadlines
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • March 24 2009

This Advisory is intended specifically to help guide individuals and companies, that wish to distribute recorded music over the Internet for pleasure or profit, through the maze of licenses and royalties required for such "webcasting" activities


Trademark claims against virtual world strip club denied on 1st Amendment grounds
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • January 20 2009

A court has ruled that incorporating into a video game a virtual strip club with a similar look and feel to the real thing has artistic relevance and that similarities between the real and virtual strip clubs were not explicitly misleading


Congress gives SoundExchange and webcasters authority to settle royalty rates
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • October 1 2008

On September 30, the U.S. Senate approved the Webcaster Settlement Act of 2008, a bill giving SoundExchange and webcasters authority to finalize an agreement on performance royalty rates