We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 100

MDY Industries, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. et al.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • February 11 2009

Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. (Blizzard) is the creator and operator of the popular online computer game World of Warcraft (WoW


Rodriguez, et al. v. Klum, et al.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • February 11 2009

The district court awarded $50,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs to prevailing defendants, finding that plaintiffs’ pursuit of their copyright infringement claim after receiving defendants’ evidence of prior independent creation was objectively unreasonable


Washington v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., et al
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • November 7 2012

California appellate court affirms anti-SLAPP dismissal of misappropriation claim brought against Grand Theft Auto developers


Arrow Productions, Ltd v. The Weinstein Company LLC
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • September 1 2014

District court dismisses copyright and trademark infringement claims of copyright owner of 1972 pornographic film Deep Throat, holding that


Cohen v. G&M Realty L.P.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • November 27 2013

In matter of first impression, district court denies preliminary injunction under federal Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA) to graffiti artists


Dunn v. DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • May 10 2013

California Court of Appeal affirms judgment in favor of defendant DreamWorks Animation on plaintiff’s breach of implied-in-fact contract claim


Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, Inc.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • June 9 2010

Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of plaintiffs’ state law claims for breach of implied contract and breach of confidence on grounds that such claims are preempted by the Copyright Act


UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Veoh Networks Inc
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • April 14 2010

District court denies Veoh Networks’ motion for attorney’s fees in DMCA safe harbor litigation, holding, inter alia, that Veoh failed to demonstrate that UMG acted in bad faith by failing to use DMCA’s notice and takedown procedure before filing suit and that UMG’s claims were not objectively unreasonable


UMG Recordings, Inc., et al. v. Veoh Networks, Inc., et al.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • September 16 2009

Defendant Veoh operates an Internet-based service that allows users to share videos with others


Armstrong v. Eagle Rock Entertainment, Inc.
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • USA
  • September 16 2009

Defendant Eagle Rock Entertainment released a DVD entitled “Mahavishnu Orchestra, Live at Montreux, 1984, 1974” which includes video and still pictures of plaintiff Ralphe Armstrong, a professional bass player and a member of the Mahavishnu Orchestra in 1974