We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 135

Halo Creative & Design v. Comptoir Des Indes Inc
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2016

The plaintiff, a Hong Kong corporation, sued the defendant, a Canadian corporation, in the Northern District of Illinois for infringement of


REMAX International wins trademark infringement suit
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 13 2009

REMAX International, Inc. brought a trademark infringement suit against Trend Setter Realty, LLC, (“Trend Setter”) for use of “red-over-white-over-blue horizontal bar design” in connection with real estate services


For purposes of determining patent term extension under 35 U.S.C 156, an enantiomer has consistently been recognized, by the FDA and the PTO, as a different “drug product” from its racemate
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 18 2010

The patent-in-suit covered an antimicrobial compound having the common name levofloxacin, and is the levorotatory enantiomer of the racemate ofloxacin, which is a known antimicrobial product


For purposes of determining inequitable conduct, “substantive involvement” in the preparation or prosecution of a patent application means that the involvement relates to the content of the application or decisions related thereto
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2010

The patent-in-suit was directed to a multi-mode radio-frequency identification system for reading encoded biocompatible chips


Use of photograph on book cover violates right of privacy
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 24 2010

A New York state court recently found a book publisher liable for using a photograph of plaintiff Tasleema Yasin for the cover of its fictional book entitled Baby Doll



USPTO: "DEER-B-GON" won’t be confused with suggestive mark "deer away"
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • March 11 2010

The scope of protection afforded to suggestive marks is limited, even after a mark used for a long time is registered and has become "incontestable."


Source Search Technologies, LLC, v. Lendingtree, LLC
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • December 15 2009

Submission of previously undisclosed prior art after fact discovery does not result in a miscarriage of justice when a sufficient opportunity remains to conduct full discovery


Site vicariously liable for infringing content created by its Web developer
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2009

A janitorial supply corporation, Master Maintenance, hired a third-party Web developer, West Central Ohio Internet Link, Ltd., to redesign its Web site


Posting information on MySpace a “publication” regardless of number of viewers
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2009

The Minnesota Court of Appeals held that the posting of information on a MySpace.com page, which was viewable by anyone with an Internet connection, constituted dissemination of information to the public even if only a few people actually saw it