We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,229

New York Court finds direct contract necessary for “Additional Insured By Written Contract” coverage
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • USA
  • January 17 2017

The “Additional Insured” provision is commonly found within a commercial general liability (“CGL”) insurance policy. This provision, as its name


Accident or Intentional Act? Contractors’ Insurance Rights Could Be Affected by the Distinction
  • Newmeyer & Dillion LLP
  • USA
  • January 12 2017

Although you can purchase insurance for damages caused by an accident (like elbowing someone inadvertently), insurance typically does not provide


Replacing a Roof Is Not Demolition
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • January 9 2017

Many liability insurance policies exclude coverage for bodily injury or property damage arising out of structural alterations that involve changing


Supplementary Payments Coverage Should Apply Even When Claim Not Covered
  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • USA
  • December 29 2016

A California appellate court held on Tuesday in Navigators Specialty Ins. Co. v. Moorefield Constr., Inc., 2016 WL 7439032, __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ (Dec. 27


Are You Really An Additional Insured?
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • December 28 2016

Parties structuring transactions or business relationships often attempt to shift risk to their counter-party by having such party included as an


Insurance Coverage for Employee Theft: How Unknown Facts can Preclude Coverage
  • Brouse McDowell
  • USA
  • December 19 2016

Recently, in Construction Contractors Employers Group, LLC v. Federal Insurance Company, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed an adverse ruling


Loss during vacancy: When will renovation or construction activity defeat a vacancy exclusion?
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • USA
  • December 15 2016

Many commercial and homeowner policies contain provisions addressing vacancy. Often these provisions exclude coverage for property that is or becomes


An Expensive Lesson About Notice of a Professional AE Malpractice Claim
  • Commonsense Construction Law LLC
  • USA
  • December 12 2016

The University of Pittsburgh has come out on the losing end of coverage battles with two different malpractice carriers for the architecture firm


Pennsylvania Federal Court Dismisses Reinsurer’s Claims Against Policyholder
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • December 1 2016

A Pennsylvania federal court dismissed direct action claims by a reinsurer against a policyholder for lack of contractual privity. In this case, a


A matter of first impression: New Jersey Court finds subcontractor’s faulty work a covered loss
  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • USA
  • October 28 2016

As a matter of first impression, the Supreme Court of New Jersey, in Cypress Point Condo. Ass'n v. Adria Towers, L.L.C., 226 N.J. 403 (N.J. 2016