We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,638

Recoupment - Is it the same transaction?
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
  • USA
  • February 15 2017

Recoupment is an equitable remedy - not expressly addressed in the Bankruptcy Code - that permits the offset of mutual debts arising out of the same


Financial ruin and the duty to settle within policy limits
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • October 17 2013

A liability insurance company has the right to take over the defense of a policyholder and to control all settlement discussions. What happens if the


Delaware Supreme Court holds that dissolution statutes do not extinguish a dissolved corporation’s potential liability to third parties
  • Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
  • USA
  • December 13 2013

The Delaware Supreme Court recently offered new insight into a dissolved corporation's exposure to liability for third party claims. In Anderson v


Expect the unexpected: The year ahead for the Financial Institutions Sector
  • Hogan Lovells
  • European Union, United Kingdom, USA
  • January 13 2017

There’s nothing new about change in the financial institutions sector. As in previous years, change for firms will be driven largely by regulation and


A guide to surviving the Kemper liquidation
  • Dentons
  • USA
  • February 4 2010

In response to an imminent Order of Liquidation against the Kemper Insurance Companies, we have prepared the following "frequently asked questions" guide summarizing issues related to: (i) the financial regulation of insurance companies; (ii) the liquidation and proof of claim process in Illinois; (iii) potential recovery by policyholders of the amount of "covered" workers' compensation claims from state guaranty associations; (iv) policyholder collateral; and (v) planning a response to the Kemper liquidation


A guide to surviving the Lumbermens rehabilitation & liquidation
  • Dentons
  • USA
  • July 2 2012

In response to the July 2, 2012 Order of Rehabilitation, and an anticipated Order of Liquidation, against Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company and American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, we have prepared the following “frequently asked questions” guide summarizing issues related to: (i) the financial regulation of insurance companies; (ii) the liquidation and proof of claim process in Illinois; (iii) potential recovery by policyholders of the amount of “covered” workers’ compensation claims from state guaranty associations; (iv) policyholder collateral; and (v) planning a response to the Lumbermens liquidation


New restrictions on creditors’ rights exclusions in title insurance policies
  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • USA
  • February 12 2010

Anyone who obtains title insurance, whether as an owner or a lender, should be aware of a recent abrupt and significant change in title insurance practices across the country


Priority of payments provision allows insurer to make settlement payments on covered claims against directors and officers
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • October 25 2012

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska has held that an insurer may make settlement payments for claims against a debtor’s directors and officers where any claims of the debtor are subordinate to those of the directors and officers under the terms of the policy


The Impact of Health Insurance Co-Op Liquidations on Providers
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • December 4 2015

A growing number of health insurance co-ops or "consumer operated and oriented plans" created under the Affordable Care Act ("ACA") are shutting down


‘Contingent claim’ not sufficient to establish right of setoff for lift-stay motion
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • October 15 2012

The debtor’s insurer sought to lift the automatic stay in order to setoff $2.2 million in return premiums against potential defense costs that the insurer expected to incur related to certain insurance claims made against the debtor