We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 336

Oklahoma Court holds failure to warn not a covered professional service
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • March 7 2013

In its recent decision in Hanover Am. Ins. Co. v. Saul, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29739 (W.D. Okl. Mar. 5, 2013), the United States District Court for

NJ Supreme Court decision expands privileging liability for healthcare facilities
  • Day Pitney LLP
  • USA
  • October 23 2015

On September 29, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its ruling in Jarrell v. Kaul, deciding several issues in connection with whether a physician's

Plaintiffs waived waiver by failing to object to an argument's improper inclusion in a Rule 50(b) motion
  • Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • USA
  • June 8 2010

Tracey Wallace had trouble reading small print and driving at night

Oklahoma court holds no coverage for medical malpractice claim
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • February 1 2013

In its recent decision in Admiral Ins. Co. v. Thomas, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10754 (W.D. Ok. Jan. 28, 2013), the United States District for the

Insurer not entitled to rescission as matter of law based on undisclosed malpractice claim made after application was submitted
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • October 20 2010

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, applying Illinois law, has held that it could not determine that a physician’s failure to disclose a claim made while his application for malpractice insurance was pending was a material misrepresentation as a matter of law

Liability insurers may have duty to defend against federal prosecutions, California Court of Appeal holds
  • Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2013

The Second Appellate District of California held on May 1 in Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v. Lopez that California Insurance Code section 533.5(b) does not

Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of negligent misrepresentation claim
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • September 4 2013

In its recent decision in MultiCare Health System v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17981 (9th Cir. Aug. 28, 2013), the United States Court

District court narrowly interprets bodily injury exclusion
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • June 23 2011

The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia has narrowly construed a bodily injury exclusion in a professional liability insurance policy in connection with determining that coverage existed for negligent supervision claims against the insured related to allegations of patient molestation by the insured’s employee

Comprehensive medical malpractice reforms advance in House and Senate committees
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2011

Last week, several proposals providing additional medical malpractice protection for physicians, hospitals, and medical schools, as well as proposals requiring out-of-state physicians to obtain expert witness certificates in order to testify in medical malpractice actions, advanced in the House and Senate

Eighth Circuit finds notice sufficient under claims-made policy
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • May 23 2011

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, applying Minnesota law, has held that an insured's letter to the insurer enclosing a notice of administrative investigation satisfied the timing and content requirements of a claims-made policy's notice provision