We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 19,179

California court dismisses tolling subclass claims with prejudice, finding issues barred by law of the case doctrine
  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • USA
  • July 30 2015

We have previously reported on a case styled Munoz v. PHH Corp., one of similar suits alleging putative class actions under the Real Estate



Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that insured did not forfeit coverage by settling without insurer’s consent even though insurer was defending under a reservation of rights
  • Duane Morris LLP
  • USA
  • July 30 2015

In an issue of first impression, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that an insured does not forfeit coverage by entering into a fair, reasonable


Managing the regulatory storm for cloud services APRA's information paper
  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • USA
  • July 30 2015

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released an information paper (Information Paper) on prudential considerations and key


Nutter bank report, July 2015
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • July 30 2015

The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) has issued a final rule expanding the types of consumer credit products that are covered by servicemember


Farmers sells a policy that is far worse then its competitors - review of the Farmers "Next Generation" homeowner's policy, part 3: overhead and profit
  • Merlin Law Group, PA
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

The title of this blog is a quote by Chip Merlin after we discussed some of the issues that have been popping up in my continued review of the


Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that insured may settle tort claim without insurer consent under “fair and reasonable” standard
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

In Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. American Nuclear Insurers, a divided Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, deciding an issue of first impression under


Which insurance carrier is responsible for damages on a construction project? Depends.
  • Burr & Forman LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

There are multiple types of insurance coverage for the various risks on a construction project. However, when there are multiple insurance carriers


Insurance filed rate defense wins over the Second Circuit
  • Dentons
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

In a noteworthy embrace of the filed rate doctrine, the Second Circuit recently ruled, in the context of a challenge to so-called lender-placed or


For “at-issue waiver,” the best defense may not be an affirmative defense
  • Carlton Fields Jorden Burt
  • USA
  • July 29 2015

As this blog has repeatedly documented, it can be hard for insurers to assert the attorney-client privilege in the context of bad faith litigation